LEADER 03656oam 22004812 450 001 9910816387303321 005 20231019220712.0 010 $a90-04-39406-0 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004394063 035 $a(CKB)4970000000170158 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5842515 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004394063 035 $a(EXLCZ)994970000000170158 100 $a20190204d2019 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAncient constitutions and modern monarchy $ehistorical writing and enlightened reform in Denmark-Norway 1730-1814 /$fHakon Evju 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d[2019] 215 $a1 online resource (331 pages) 225 0 $aStudies in the history of political thought,$x1873-6548 ;$vVolume 14 300 $aRevision of author's thesis (doctoral)--Universitetet i Oslo, 2014, titled Ancient constitutions and modern monarchy : historical writing and enlightened reform in Denmark-Norway, c. 1730-1814. 311 0 $a90-04-36684-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFront Matter -- Copyright Page -- Dedication -- Author?s Note -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- Ancient Constitutionalism in Dano-Norwegian Historical Writing -- The Politics of History in Early Modern Denmark?Norway before circa 1730 -- The Origins of Government and the Meaning of Monarchy -- Northern Antiquity and the Writing of National History -- Feudal Law and Allodial Liberty in Europe and the North -- Ancient Constitutionalism in Debates over Agricultural Reforms in Norway and Denmark -- The Dano-Norwegian Economic Predicament and the Question of Agricultural Improvement -- The Norwegian Past and the Defence of Odelsretten in Norway -- The Danish Past and the Call for Reforming the Manorial Economy in Denmark -- Conclusion -- Back Matter -- Primary Sources -- Secondary Literature -- Index. 330 $aWhat was the role of historical thought and historical inquiry in debates over reform during the Enlightenment? In Ancient Constitutions and Modern Monarchy , Håkon Evju addresses this issue by considering the case of eighteenth-century Denmark-Norway. He argues that historians contributed crucially to the rethinking of Dano-Norwegian absolutism in the face of a shift towards commercial society. Their vision of an ancient Nordic constitution helped recast the monarchy as moderate and influenced debates over agricultural improvements in Denmark and Norway. In an innovative comparative analysis, Evju demonstrates how notions of a common political past were used differently in the two kingdoms. Yet in both cases, such appeals to tradition were vital in controversies over monarchical reform politics during the Enlightenment. Håkon Evju, Ph.D. (2014) in History, University of Oslo, is Associate Professor of Intellectual History at that university. He has published numerous articles on different aspects of the Enlightenment in Denmark-Norway. 410 0$aStudies in the History of Political Thought;$v14. 607 $aDenmark$xHistory$y18th century 607 $aDenmark$xIntellectual life$y18th century 607 $aDenmark$xKings and rulers 607 $aNorway$xHistory$y18th century 607 $aNorway$xIntellectual life$y18th century 607 $aNorway$xKings and rulers 676 $a948.1/024 700 $aEvju$b Ha?kon$f1981-$01644961 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816387303321 996 $aAncient constitutions and modern monarchy$93991117 997 $aUNINA