LEADER 11093oam 2200493 450 001 9910816308803321 005 20231026175423.0 010 $a3-8382-7671-X 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC7135214 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL7135214 035 $a(CKB)25315244700041 035 $a(EXLCZ)9925315244700041 100 $a20230326d2022 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aHow patronal networks shape opportunities for local citizen participation in a hybrid regime $ea comparative analysis of five cities in Ukraine /$fOleksandra Keudel ; with a foreword by Sabine Kropp 210 1$aStuttgart :$cibidem-Verlag,$d[2022] 210 4$dİ2022 215 $a1 online resource (528 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aSoviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society ;$vv.245 311 08$aPrint version: Keudel, Oleksandra How Patronal Networks Shape Opportunities for Local Citizen Participation in a Hybrid Regime Berlin : Ibidem Verlag,c2022 327 $aIntro -- Acknowledgements -- Contents -- List of Figures -- List of Tables -- List of Appendices -- List of Abbreviations -- Foreword by Sabine Kropp -- 1 Introduction -- 1.1 Problem definition and research question -- 1.1.1 Why should we care about formal institutional mechanisms for citizen participation? -- 1.1.2 Ukraine's hybrid regime as an ambiguous case for local citizen participation -- 1.1.3 Why is the variation in institutional mechanisms for citizen participation in Ukraine puzzling? -- 1.1.4 The research question -- 1.2 Central argument: Institutions for citizen participation as a by-product of local patronal politics -- 1.3 Methodological approach -- 1.4 Contribution -- 1.5 Structure of the book -- 2 Citizen Participation Concept and Its Operationalization for the Cases in Ukraine -- 2.1 Conceptualizing citizen participation -- 2.1.1 Theoretical approaches to citizen participation: Between democracy enhancement and government efficiency -- 2.1.2 Definition of citizen participation as a multi-dimensional process -- 2.2 Operationalizing citizen participation through formal institutional mechanisms -- 2.2.1 Institutional mechanisms for citizen participation in Ukraine -- 2.2.2 Measurement of variation in institutional mechanisms for citizen participation -- 2.3 Conclusion -- 3 A Framework for Explaining Variation in Opportunities for Local Citizen Participation -- 3.1 Unpacking the context for citizen participation: Hybrid political regime -- 3.1.1 Alternative conceptualizations of regime hybridity -- 3.1.2 Hybrid regime as the outcome of elite interactions that limit access to societal resources and functions -- 3.2 Conceptualizing patronal networks and their arrangements -- 3.2.1 Arrangements of patronal networks: The typology -- 3.2.2 Cohesion in patronal networks -- 3.2.3 Delineating patronal networks from corrupt networks. 327 $a3.3 Explaining opportunities for citizen participation: Patronal networks and resource preferences of incumbents -- 3.3.1 Uncertainty in patronal network arrangements and the institutional preferences of local politicians -- 3.3.2 Explicating the causal mechanism: the functional fit of citizen participation to incumbents' governance resources -- 3.4 Summary: How incumbent cherry-picking in varying arrangements of patronal networks translates into diverse opportunities for citizen participation -- 4 Research Context and Design -- 4.1 Context of the study -- 4.1.1 Ukrainian patronal politics and its sub-national dimension -- 4.1.2 Institutional enablers for patronal politics at the local level -- 4.2 Empirical strategy and main methodological considerations -- 4.2.1 Comparative case study in five purposefully selected cities -- 4.2.2 Data collection: semi-structured interviews, open data sources and (local) media -- 4.2.3 Content analysis for interview data -- 4.3 Case selection -- 4.3.1 Regional centres as potential cases -- 4.3.2 Measurement of variation in arrangements of patronal networks -- 4.3.3 Mapping potential cases -- 4.3.4 Selecting cases -- 4.4 Operationalization of the independent variable for the case studies -- 4.4.1 Identifying patronal networks in the case studies -- 4.4.2 Identifying arrangements of patronal networks in the case studies -- 4.5 Operationalization of the dependent variable for the case studies -- 4.5.1 Chernivtsi -- 4.5.2 Lviv -- 4.5.3 Kropyvnytskyi -- 4.5.4 Odesa -- 4.5.5 Kharkiv -- 4.6 Summary and outlook for the empirical chapters -- 5 Kharkiv A Single-Pyramid Arrangement Restricts Opportunities for Citizen Participation -- 5.1 The arrangement of patronal networks -- 5.1.1 The patronal network landscape -- 5.1.2 A single-pyramid arrangement at the city level: Patronage via the executive. 327 $a5.2 Adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 5.2.1 Struggles for citizen informing via the Rules of Procedure of the city council and the executive committee -- 5.2.2 Continuing limits to consulting, control and partnership mechanisms in the city charter -- 5.2.3 The participatory budget: The only supported participatory mechanism -- 5.3 A single-pyramid arrangement amplifies the role of mayors' personal preferences for participation -- 5.4 The selective functional fit and (non-)adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 5.4.1 Prioritizing the partnership dimension as supplementing organization and authority: The advantages of PB for the patron -- 5.4.2 Restricted consulting and (nearly) impossible control provide a good fit to the mayor's prioritised resource of authority -- 5.4.3 Misfit of the informing dimension to the mayor's governance resources -- 5.5 Conclusion -- 6 Odesa Coordination under a Dominant Network Hampers Participatory Institutions -- 6.1 Arrangement of patronal networks -- 6.1.1 The patronal network landscape -- 6.1.2 Coordinated network arrangement, facilitated by the mayor -- 6.2 Adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 6.2.1 Fragmented gains for citizen informing: The Rules of Procedure of the city council and of the executive committee -- 6.2.2 Control and consulting dimensions: Tolerated electronic petitions and the "good-as-is" city charter -- 6.2.3 Partnership dimension: The participatory budget as a flagship participatory project -- 6.3 A coordinated arrangement of patronal networks limits options for citizen participation -- 6.3.1 Selective adoption of mechanisms within informing dimension-the right target and time -- 6.3.2 Consulting, partnership, and control mechanisms selectively avoided because they infringe on the nodality and authority of the executive. 327 $a6.4 Functional fit: Enables selective introduction of mechanisms within consulting and partnership dimensions, and disables most others -- 6.4.1 Electronic petitions: The mayor's consulting mechanism -- 6.4.2 Functional fit of the participatory budget to the mayor's preferred resources -- 6.5 Conclusion -- 7 Lviv The Coordination of "Equals" Returns Accessible Participatory Institutions -- 7.1 Arrangement of patronal networks -- 7.1.1 The patronal network landscape -- 7.1.2 Coordinated arrangement of local patronal networks under the mayor 's brokerage and occasional challenger attempts -- 7.2 Adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 7.2.1 Informing dimension: The Rules of Procedure of the city council and the executive committee -- 7.2.2 Control and consulting dimensions: The city charter, its constituent regulations and electronic petitions -- 7.2.3 Partnership dimension: The participatory budget and local initiative -- 7.3 The framework-setting role of the arrangement of patronal networks -- 7.3.1 Coordination restricts the adoption of mechanisms of citizen informing -- 7.3.2 Steered participation: The consulting and control dimensions "filtered" through the executive -- 7.3.3 Partnership: A win-win solution under the supervision of the executive -- 7.4 The functional fit as an enabler for participatory institutions -- 7.4.1 Functional fit: Steered participation strengthens the mayor's brokering of resources -- 7.4.2 The informing dimension misaligns with the mayor's brokering resources -- 7.5 Conclusion -- 8 Kropyvnytskyi Competition-Turned-Selective-Coordination Slowed Down Participatory Developments -- 8.1 Arrangement of patronal networks: Competition turned into selective coordination -- 8.1.1 The patronal network landscape -- 8.1.2 Dynamic arrangement of local patronal networks: From competition to selective coordination. 327 $a8.2 Adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 8.2.1 Informing dimension: The Rules of Procedure of the city council -- 8.2.2 Control and consulting dimensions: The city charter, electronic petitions and consultations with public -- 8.2.3 The participatory budget -- 8.3 The framework-setting role of the arrangement of patronal networks -- 8.3.1 How competition was a "window of opportunity" for the informing dimension of participation -- 8.3.2 The increasing coordination between patronal networks stalled the adoption of mechanisms within the control dimension -- 8.3.3 The partnership dimension: the participatory budget-a priority in the coordination phase -- 8.4 The functional fit of citizen participation to resource preferences of local politicians -- 8.4.1 Politicians' governance resources and the functional fit of informing and control -- 8.4.2 Politicians' governance resources and the functional fit of partnership and consulting -- 8.5 Conclusion -- 9 Chernivtsi Competing Arrangement and the Mayor's Functional Fit Return Accessible Participatory Mechanisms -- 9.1 Arrangement of patronal networks -- 9.1.1 The patronal network landscape -- 9.1.2 Dynamic development of competition between major patronal networks -- 9.2 Adoption of participatory mechanisms -- 9.2.1 The city charter -- 9.2.2 The Rules of Procedure of the city council -- 9.2.3 The participatory budget -- 9.2.4 Electronic petitions -- 9.3 Competing arrangement of patronal networks is conducive to political support for citizen participation -- 9.3.1 How competition between patronal networks returned participatory institutions within the informing and control dimensions -- 9.3.2 The consulting dimension and its (mis)use for inter-network competition -- 9.4 The functional fit of citizen participation and "the public" as a resource; 9.4.1 Participatory budget as a tool to supplement governance resources for leaders of both competing networks. 410 0$aSoviet and Post-Soviet Politics and Society 606 $aMunicipal government$zUkraine$xCitizen participation 606 $aPatronage, Political$zUkraine 615 0$aMunicipal government$xCitizen participation. 615 0$aPatronage, Political 676 $a320.8 700 $aKeudel$b Oleksandra$01655103 702 $aKropp$b Sabine 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816308803321 996 $aHow patronal networks shape opportunities for local citizen participation in a hybrid regime$94007307 997 $aUNINA LEADER 03289oam 2200733I 450 001 9910964109503321 005 20250923000003.0 010 $a0-429-91638-8 010 $a0-429-90215-8 010 $a0-429-47738-4 010 $a1-283-12555-2 010 $a9786613125552 010 $a1-84940-308-2 024 7 $a10.4324/9780429477386 035 $a(CKB)2670000000093988 035 $a(EBL)712264 035 $a(OCoLC)729166989 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000524299 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12185326 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000524299 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10546754 035 $a(PQKB)10379218 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC712264 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL712264 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10477601 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL312555 035 $a(OCoLC)1029235402 035 $a(OCoLC)52563659 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB145906 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000093988 100 $a20180706d2018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMultiple Family Therapy $eThe Marlborough Model and Its Wider Applications /$fEia Asen, Neil Dawson, and Brenda McHugh ; foreword by Salvador Minuchlin ; introduction by Alan Cooklin 205 $aFirst edition. 210 $aLondon ;$aNew York $cKarnac Books$d2001 210 1$aLondon :$cTaylor and Francis,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (155 p.) 225 1 $aSystemic thinking and practice series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 08$a0-367-10520-9 311 08$a1-85575-277-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCOVER; CONTENTS; EDITORS' FOREWORD; FOREWORD; ABOUT THE AUTHORS; PREFACE; INTRODUCTION; CHAPTER ONE: Developing a contextual approach; CHAPTER TWO: Multiple family therapy-history and concepts; CHAPTER THREE: Developing a day unit for families; CHAPTER FOUR: The Family School; CHAPTER FIVE: Applications of the Marlborough Model; CHAPTER SIX: Skills and techniques in multiple family therapy; Epilogue; REFERENCES; INDEX 330 $a"If a troubled family contains the resources to solve its own problems, then why not bring such families together, to share their experiences and support each other This is the approach of the Marlborough Family Service, the institution at the forefront of development for child-protection cases, school-based interventions and family therapy for ethnic-minority communities for over twenty years. In this book three long-standing staff members describe for the first time their innovative work with a range of family problems, from marital violence and child abuse to educational problems and eating disorders."--Provided by publisher. 410 0$aSystemic thinking and practice series. 606 $aFamily psychotherapy 606 $aMultiple psychotherapy 615 0$aFamily psychotherapy. 615 0$aMultiple psychotherapy. 676 $a616.89/156 676 $a616.89156 700 $aAsen$b Eia$f1946-$0528272 702 $aDawson$b Neil 702 $aMcHugh$b Brenda 801 0$bFlBoTFG 801 1$bFlBoTFG 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910964109503321 996 $aMultiple Family Therapy$94435669 997 $aUNINA