LEADER 04554oam  22011774  450 
001 9910816282003321
005 20240410162612.0
010   $a1-4623-4274-4
010   $a1-4527-9555-X
010   $a1-283-51546-6
010   $a1-4519-0897-0
010   $a9786613827913
035   $a(CKB)3360000000443719
035   $a(EBL)3014427
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000942126
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11543354
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000942126
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10971275
035   $a(PQKB)10602275
035   $a(OCoLC)694141075
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3014427
035   $a(IMF)WPIEE2006103
035   $a(EXLCZ)993360000000443719
100   $a20020129d2006      uf         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMind the Gap?Is Economic Growth in India Leaving Some States Behind? /$fCatriona Purfield
205   $a1st ed.
210  1$aWashington, D.C. :$cInternational Monetary Fund,$d2006.
215   $a1 online resource (28 p.)
225 1 $aIMF Working Papers
300   $a"April 2006".
311   $a1-4518-6363-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $a""Contents""; ""I. INTRODUCTION""; ""II. STYLIZED FACTS ABOUT GROWTH IN INDIA""; ""III. DO POLICIES MATTER?""; ""IV. CONCLUSION""; ""REFERENCES""
330 3 $aThis paper examines how growth has varied across India's states. It finds that (i) the income gap between rich and poor states has widened; (ii) rich and faster-growing states have been more effective in reducing poverty; (iii) poor and slower-growing states have had little success in generating private sector jobs; (iv) labor and capital flows do little to close income gaps; and (v) the volatility in economic growth is greatest in poor states. Differences in states' policies affect the cross-state pattern of growth. Greater private sector investment, smaller governments, and better institutions are found to have a positive impact on growth.
410  0$aIMF Working Papers; Working Paper ;$vNo. 2006/103
606   $aEconomic development$xEconometric models
606   $aLabor$2imf
606   $aMacroeconomics$2imf
606   $aSocial Services and Welfare$2imf
606   $aPoverty and Homelessness$2imf
606   $aPersonal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions$2imf
606   $aGovernment Policy$2imf
606   $aProvision and Effects of Welfare Program$2imf
606   $aLabor Economics: General$2imf
606   $aEmployment$2imf
606   $aUnemployment$2imf
606   $aWages$2imf
606   $aIntergenerational Income Distribution$2imf
606   $aAggregate Human Capital$2imf
606   $aAggregate Labor Productivity$2imf
606   $aWelfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General$2imf
606   $aLabour$2imf
606   $aincome economics$2imf
606   $aSocial welfare & social services$2imf
606   $aPoverty & precarity$2imf
606   $aPersonal income$2imf
606   $aPoverty reduction$2imf
606   $aPoverty$2imf
606   $aIncome$2imf
606   $aLabor economics$2imf
606   $aEconomic theory$2imf
607   $aIndia$xEconomic policy
607   $aIndia$2imf
615  0$aEconomic development$xEconometric models.
615  7$aLabor
615  7$aMacroeconomics
615  7$aSocial Services and Welfare
615  7$aPoverty and Homelessness
615  7$aPersonal Income, Wealth, and Their Distributions
615  7$aGovernment Policy
615  7$aProvision and Effects of Welfare Program
615  7$aLabor Economics: General
615  7$aEmployment
615  7$aUnemployment
615  7$aWages
615  7$aIntergenerational Income Distribution
615  7$aAggregate Human Capital
615  7$aAggregate Labor Productivity
615  7$aWelfare, Well-Being, and Poverty: General
615  7$aLabour
615  7$aincome economics
615  7$aSocial welfare & social services
615  7$aPoverty & precarity
615  7$aPersonal income
615  7$aPoverty reduction
615  7$aPoverty
615  7$aIncome
615  7$aLabor economics
615  7$aEconomic theory
700   $aPurfield$b Catriona$01601444
712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund.$bAsia and Pacific Dept.
801  0$bDcWaIMF
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910816282003321
996   $aMind the Gap?Is Economic Growth in India Leaving Some States Behind$94122212
997   $aUNINA