LEADER 03708nam  2200625Ia 450 
001 9910815915603321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-16254-3
010   $a9786612162541
010   $a90-272-9824-6
035   $a(CKB)1000000000555980
035   $a(OCoLC)70766135
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary5004939
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000279060
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11222263
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000279060
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10258340
035   $a(PQKB)11185760
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC622512
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000555980
100   $a20010329d2001      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aEmpty categories in sentence processing /$fSam Featherston
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$dc2001
215   $a1 online resource (295 p.)
225 1 $aLinguistik aktuell =$aLinguistics today ;$vv. 43
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a1-58811-069-9 
311   $a90-272-2764-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [261]-274) and index.
327   $aEmpty Categories in Sentence Processing -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC data -- Dedication -- Table of contents -- Foreword -- Abbreviations -- Chapter 1. Introduction -- Chapter 2. Empty categories in PPT and HPSG -- Chapter 3. Parsers and gap processing -- Chapter 4. Antecedent Reactivation and Trace -- Chapter 5. NP-trace and PRO: Local ECs -- Chapter 6. Evidence from sentence matching on wh -trace dependencies -- Chapter 7. Conclusions -- Appendix 1. Materials for CMLP Experiments 1 -3 -- Appendix 2. Materials for probe recognition Experiment 4 -- Appendix 3. Materials for ERP Experiment 5 -- Appendix 4. Materials for sentence matching Experiment 6 -- References -- Index -- LINGUISTIK AKTUELL/LINGUISTICS TODAY (LA).
330   $aThis book reports a research program into one of the most controversial questions in the syntax - processing interface: The behavior of the parser at gap positions. While the work done is largely experimental, the results are analyzed both for their relevance to sentence processing and for their implications for competing syntactic frameworks. In particular the differing predictions of PPT and HPSG for structures with dislocated constituents are tested for their empirical adequacy. The author addresses a broad range of questions about gap processing and uses a broad range of methodologies to cut through the confounds which prevent previous work providing clear answers. Wh-movement, scrambling, raising, and equi structures are all addressed, and all current accounts of the experimental evidence evaluated. The results move the debate forward significantly, and provide clear confirmation of some non-trivial claims of generative grammar.
410  0$aLinguistik aktuell ;$vBd. 43.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSentences
606   $aPrinciples and parameters (Linguistics)
606   $aHead-driven phrase structure grammar
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSyntax.
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xSentences.
615  0$aPrinciples and parameters (Linguistics)
615  0$aHead-driven phrase structure grammar.
676   $a415
700   $aFeatherston$b Sam$01605723
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910815915603321
996   $aEmpty Categories in Sentence Processing$94057481
997   $aUNINA