LEADER 04737nam 22007575 450 001 9910815616303321 005 20230124194541.0 010 $a0-8232-7728-3 010 $a0-8232-7671-6 024 7 $a10.1515/9780823276714 035 $a(CKB)3790000000548334 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5151543 035 $a(DE-B1597)555447 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780823276714 035 $a(OCoLC)1013824826 035 $a(EXLCZ)993790000000548334 100 $a20200723h20182018 fg 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aPolitical Concepts $eA Critical Lexicon /$fAdi Ophir, Ann Laura Stoler; J. M. Bernstein 210 1$aNew York, NY :$cFordham University Press,$d[2018] 210 4$d©2018 215 $a1 online resource (260 pages) $cillustrations, tables 225 0 $aIdiom: Inventing Writing Theory 311 0 $a0-8232-7668-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tCONTENTS --$tINTRODUCTION. POLITICAL CONCEPTS: A CRITICAL LEXICON --$t1. ARCH? --$t2. BLOOD --$t3. COLONY --$t4. CONCEPT --$t5. CONSTITUENT POWER --$t6. DEVELOPMENT --$t7. EXPLOITATION --$t8. FEDERATION --$t9. IDENTITY --$t10. THE RULE OF LAW --$t11. SEXUAL DIFFERENCE --$t12. TRANSLATION --$tBIBLIOGRAPHY --$tCONTRIBUTORS --$tINDEX 330 $aDeciding what is and what is not political is a fraught, perhaps intractably opaque matter. Just who decides the question; on what grounds; to what ends?these seem like properly political questions themselves. Deciding what is political and what is not can serve to contain and restrain struggles, make existing power relations at once self-evident and opaque, and blur the possibility of reimagining them differently. Political Concepts seeks to revive our common political vocabulary?both everyday and academic?and to do so critically. Its entries take the form of essays in which each contributor presents her or his own original reflection on a concept posed in the traditional Socratic question format ?What is X?? and asks what sort of work a rethinking of that concept can do for us now. The explicitness of a radical questioning of this kind gives authors both the freedom and the authority to engage, intervene in, critique, and transform the conceptual terrain they have inherited. Each entry, either implicitly or explicitly, attempts to re-open the question ?What is political thinking?? Each is an effort to reinvent political writing. In this setting the political as such may be understood as a property, a field of interest, a dimension of human existence, a set of practices, or a kind of event. Political Concepts does not stand upon a decided concept of the political but returns in practice and in concern to the question ?What is the political?? by submitting the question to a field of plural contention.The concepts collected in Political Concepts are ?Arche? (Stathis Gourgouris), ?Blood? (Gil Anidjar), ?Colony? (Ann Laura Stoler), ?Concept? (Adi Ophir), ?Constituent Power? (Andreas Kalyvas), ?Development? (Gayatri Spivak), ?Exploitation? (Étienne Balibar), ?Federation? (Jean Cohen), ?Identity? (Akeel Bilgrami), ?Rule of Law? (J. M. Bernstein), ?Sexual Difference? (Joan Copjec), and ?Translation? (Jacques Lezra) 410 0$aIdiom (Fordham University Press) 606 $aPolitical science$xPhilosophy 610 $aIdentity. 610 $aauthority. 610 $ablood. 610 $acolony. 610 $aconcept. 610 $adefinition. 610 $aexploitation. 610 $alexicon. 610 $apolitics. 610 $atranslation. 615 0$aPolitical science$xPhilosophy. 676 $a320.01 700 $aOphir$b Adi$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$0170272 701 $aAnidjar$b Gil$01187637 701 $aBalibar$b Étienne$f1942-$0381689 701 $aBernstein$b J. M$01698766 701 $aBilgrami$b Akeel$0732400 701 $aCohen$b Jean L$0618616 701 $aCopjec$b Joan$01698767 701 $aGourgouris$b Stathis$01187640 701 $aKalyvas$b Andreas$01127184 701 $aLezra$b Jacques$0706129 701 $aOphir$b Adi$0170272 701 $aSpivak$b Gayatri Chakravorty$0324501 701 $aStoler$b Ann Laura$0522466 702 $aBernstein$b J. M.$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aStoler$b Ann Laura$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910815616303321 996 $aPolitical Concepts$94080490 997 $aUNINA