LEADER 03553nam 2200565 450 001 9910815502903321 005 20230207220425.0 010 $a1-57181-904-5 010 $a1-84545-295-X 010 $a1-78238-961-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9781782389613 035 $a(CKB)3710000000641322 035 $a(EBL)4501281 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4501281 035 $a(DE-B1597)636709 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781782389613 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000641322 100 $a20160426h20052005 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aHolocaust monuments and national memory cultures in France and Germany since 1989 $ethe origins and political function of the Ve?l' d'Hiv' in Paris and the Holocaust Monument in Berlin /$fPeter Carrier 210 1$aNew York, [New York] ;$aOxford, [England] :$cBerghahn Books,$d2005. 210 4$d©2005 215 $a1 online resource (278 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aHolocaust Monuments and National Memory Cultures in France and Germany since 1989; Contents; Introduction; Part I. Monuments and Collective Memory; 1. Monuments in History; 2. History in Monuments; Part II. Paris and Berlin as Sites of Memory of the 1990s; 3. Paris: the Ve?l' d'Hiv' and the Promise of National Reconciliation 1992-97; 4. Berlin: the Monument for the Murdered Jews of Europe and the Promise of Consensus 1988-2000; 5. The Institutionalisation of Memory in Public Art and Rhetoric; Parrtt III. Dialogic Monuments between Negotiation and State Intervention 327 $a6. The National Memorial Paradigm7. The Postnational Memorial Paradigm; 8. Dialogic Monuments; Appendix; Bibliography; Index 330 $aSince 1989, two sites of memory with respect to the deportation and persecution of Jews in France and Germany during the Second World War have received intense public attention: the Vélo d'Hiver (Winter Velodrome) in Paris and the Monument for the Murdered Jews of Europe or Holocaust Monument in Berlin. Why is this so? Both monuments, the author argues, are unique in the history of memorial projects. Although they are genuine "sites of memory", neither monument celebrates history, but rather serve as platforms for the deliberation, negotiation and promotion of social consensus over the memorial status of war crimes in France and Germany. The debates over these monuments indicate that it is the communication among members of the public via the mass media, rather than qualities inherent in the sites themselves, which transformed these sites into symbols beyond traditional conceptions of heritage and patriotism. 606 $aHolocaust memorials 606 $aHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)$xInfluence 606 $aMemory$xSocial aspects 606 $aDenkmal fu?r die ermordeten Juden Europas (Berlin, Germany) 615 0$aHolocaust memorials. 615 0$aHolocaust, Jewish (1939-1945)$xInfluence. 615 0$aMemory$xSocial aspects. 615 0$aDenkmal fu?r die ermordeten Juden Europas (Berlin, Germany) 676 $a940.53/1864/0943155 686 $a15.99$2bcl 700 $aCarrier$b Peter$01160590 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910815502903321 996 $aHolocaust monuments and national memory cultures in France and Germany since 1989$94083871 997 $aUNINA