LEADER 05465nam 2200721 450 001 9910815350203321 005 20230803204250.0 010 $a90-272-6963-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000218753 035 $a(EBL)1764741 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001289660 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12442988 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001289660 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11233833 035 $a(PQKB)10087037 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1764741 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1764741 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10907610 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL636336 035 $a(OCoLC)887507626 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000218753 100 $a20140826h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aRomance Perspectives on Construction Grammar /$fedited by Hans C. Boas, Francisco Gonza?lvez Garci?a 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (326 p.) 225 1 $aConstructional Approaches to Language ;$vVolume 15 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-05085-6 311 $a90-272-0437-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. 327 $aRomance Perspectives on Construction Grammar; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 1. Applying constructional concepts to Romance languages; 1. Introduction; 2. Expanding Construction Grammar from English to other languages; 3. Comparing constructions in Romance languages: Diachronic issues; 4. Comparing constructions in Romance languages: Synchronic issues; 5. Overview of chapters; 6. Conclusions; References; 2. The role of constructional meanings in novel verb-noun compounds in Spanish; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. Experiment 1: A comprehension task3. Experiment 2: A production task; 4. Conclusions; Acknowledgement; References; 3. From lexicalization to constructional generalizations: On complex prepositions in French; 1. Introduction; 2. The (lexical) construction sous ('under'); 3. The Mediate Dependency Construction [= MDC]; 4. Additional restrictions: Towards substantive idioms; 5. Conclusions; References; Appendices; 4. A constructional corpus-based approach to 'weak' verbs in French; 1. Definition of 'weak' verbs and previous approaches; 2. Weak verbs in contemporary spoken French 327 $a3. Weak verbs: Theoretical challenges and possible solutions4. Weak verbs as constructions; 5. The weak verb construction: A case of grammaticalization?; 6. Some concluding remarks; References; 5. The Narrative Infinitive Construction in French and Latin; 1. Introduction; 2. Root infinitives; 3. The properties of Narrative Infinitives; 4. How to approach Root Infinitives?; 5. Infinitival constructions; Abbreviations; References; 6. Bringing together fragments and constructions: Evidence from complementation in English and Spani; 1. Introduction; 2. Thompson's fragment analysis revisited 327 $a3. The subjective-transitive construction in English4. Where do Spanish verbless complement constructions fit in?; 5. Closing remarks and outlook; References; 7. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Basic data on gapping; 3. The case for a construction-based analysis of gapping; 4. Parallelism constraints on gapping; 5. A construction-based analysis in HPSG; 6. Conclusion; References; 8. Variable type framing in Spanish constructions of directed motion; 1. Introduction; 2. An overview of previous research on manner of motion verbs; 3. The theoretical framework 327 $a4. The present study5. Conclusions and theoretical implications; References; Author index; Construction index; Language index; Subject index 330 $aSpanish constructions of telic motion with manner verbs are somewhat problematic for the Talmian typology, while also posing a challenge for constructionist frameworks anchored in English grammar. In response to Talmy (2000), Aske (1989), Morimoto (2008), and Beavers et al. (2010) among others, I demonstrate in this article that this construction type tends to be acceptable whenever the lexical meaning of the verb implies an element of directed motion. Drawing on Goldberg (2006) and Pedersen (2009, 2013), I suggest that schematicity is a typological parameter, and, more specifically, that the 410 0$aConstructional approaches to language ;$vVolume 15. 606 $aRomance languages$xInfinitival constructions 606 $aRomance languages$xResultative constructions 606 $aRomance languages$xGrammar, Generative 606 $aRomance languages$xGrammar, Comparative 606 $aConstruction grammar 615 0$aRomance languages$xInfinitival constructions. 615 0$aRomance languages$xResultative constructions. 615 0$aRomance languages$xGrammar, Generative. 615 0$aRomance languages$xGrammar, Comparative. 615 0$aConstruction grammar. 676 $a440/.045 702 $aBoas$b Hans Christian$f1971- 702 $aGonza?lvez-Garci?a$b Francisco 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910815350203321 996 $aRomance Perspectives on Construction Grammar$93967253 997 $aUNINA