LEADER 03331nam  2200601 a 450 
001 9910815240003321
005 20240514051121.0
010   $a1-283-31233-6
010   $a9786613312334
010   $a90-272-7571-8
035   $a(CKB)2550000000064103
035   $a(EBL)794808
035   $a(OCoLC)759101592
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001012822
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11650153
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001012822
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11052898
035   $a(PQKB)11494245
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC794808
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL794808
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10509523
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000064103
100   $a19980317d1998      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aNostratic $esifting the evidence /$fedited by Joseph C. Salmons, Brian D. Joseph
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$dc1998
215   $a1 online resource (298 p.)
225 1 $aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science. Series IV, Current issues in linguistic theory,$x0304-0763 ;$vv. 142
300   $aBased on papers presented at the 2nd Workshop on Comparative Linguistics which was held at Eastern Michigan University, Fall 1993.
311   $a90-272-3646-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $aNOSTRATIC; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; INTRODUCTION; SOME DRAFT PRINCIPLES FOR CLASSIFICATION; NOSTRATIC, EURASIATIC, AND INDO-EUROPEAN; THE CONVERGENCE OFEURASIATIC AND NOSTRATIC; EXPLORING THE NOSTRATIC HYPOTHESIS; INDO-EUROPEAN AND NOSTRATIC:SOME FURTHER COMMENTS(A RESPONSE TO""EXPLORING THE NOSTRATIC HYPOTHESIS""); NOSTRATIC: A PERSONAL ASSESSMENT; PROBABILISTIC EVIDENCE FOR INDO-URALIC; A PROBABILISTIC EVALUATIONOF NORTH EURASIATIC NOSTRATIC; RESPONSE TO OSWALT AND RINGE; THE IMPLICATIONS OF LISLAKH FOR NOSTRATIC; NOSTRATIC AND ALTAIC
327   $aREGULAR SOUND CORRESPONDENCESAND LONG-DISTANCE GENETIC COMPARISONSUBJECT INDEX; LANGUAGE INDEX
330   $aThe "Nostratic" hypothesis - positing a common linguistic ancestor for a wide range of language families including Indo-European, Uralic, and Afro-Asiatic - has produced one of the most enduring and often intense controversies in linguistics. Overwhelmingly, though, both supporters of the hypothesis and those who reject it have not dealt directly with one another's arguments. This volume brings together selected representatives of both sides, as well as a number of agnostic historical linguists, with the aim of examining the evidence for this particular hypothesis in the context of distant gen
410  0$aAmsterdam studies in the theory and history of linguistic science.$nSeries IV,$pCurrent issues in linguistic theory ;$vv. 142.
606   $aNostratic hypothesis$vCongresses
615  0$aNostratic hypothesis
676   $a410
701   $aSalmons$b Joe$f1956-$0164723
701   $aJoseph$b Brian D$0162683
712 12$aWorkshop on Comparative Linguistics$d(2nd :$f1993 :$eEastern Michigan University)
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910815240003321
996   $aNostratic$94072756
997   $aUNINA