LEADER 03299oam 2200649 a 450 001 9910814676203321 005 20231013230040.0 010 $a1-283-35981-2 010 $a9786613359810 010 $a90-272-8108-4 035 $a(CKB)2550000000073803 035 $a(EBL)805775 035 $a(OCoLC)769342185 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000633702 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11386591 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000633702 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10621721 035 $a(PQKB)10575135 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805775 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805775 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517195 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL335981 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000073803 100 $a19820325d1980 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aContexts of understanding /$fHerman Parret 210 1$aAmsterdam :$cBenjamins,$d1980. 215 $a1 online resource (117 pages) 225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond 311 0 $a90-272-2509-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aCONTEXTS OF UNDERSTANDING; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; PREFACE; Table of contents; 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.1 The difficulty of understanding understanding; 1.2 Understanding versus explanation, interpretation and translation; 1.3 Aspects of a psycho-pragmatic theory of understanding; 2. SIGNIFICANCE AND UNDERSTANDING; 2.1 Acceptance; 2.2 What we understand when understanding; 2.3 How we understand when understanding; 2.4 Presentification and de s crib ability; 3. PERSPECTIVAL UNDERSTANDING; 3.1 PROLEGOMENA; 3.1.1. The heuristic orientation of the theory of language 327 $a3.1.2 The pragmatic orientation of the theory of understanding; 3.1.3. The epistemological orientation of the theory of understanding; 3.2 FREGEAN INTERLUDE; 3.3 f(p* . . . ); 3.3..1, The paratactic analysis of {sense, force}; 3.3.2, f is neither a mode nor an attitude but rather a mood; 3.3.3. f is not a representation but an act-indicator; 3.4. p[(f(p* . . . )]; 3.4.1. The reductionistic analysis of the 'community of significance'; 3.4.2. The function of the n-operator; 4. CONTEXTUALISM AND TRANSCENDENTALISM IN THE THEORY OF UNDERSTANDING; 4.1. CONTEXTUALISM; 4.1.1. Types of contexts; CO-TEXT 327 $aINTRINSIC CONTEXT; EXTRINSIC CONTEXT; C(p); B(p); C(f); B(f); B(p); C(p); 4.2. TRANSCENDENTALISM; 4.2.1. Psycho-pragmatic transcendentalia; 4.2.2. The Parsimony Principle; FOOTNOTES; REFERENCES 330 $aThis essay deals with the difficulty of understanding understanding, taking the understanding of natural language fragments as a paradigm. 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v1:6. 606 $aHermeneutics 606 $aComprehension 606 $aSemantics (Philosophy) 606 $aLanguage and languages$xPhilosophy 615 0$aHermeneutics. 615 0$aComprehension. 615 0$aSemantics (Philosophy) 615 0$aLanguage and languages$xPhilosophy. 676 $a121/.68 700 $aParret$b Herman$0213880 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910814676203321 996 $aContexts of understanding$94098620 997 $aUNINA