LEADER 04469nam 2200553 450 001 9910814315003321 005 20230725040026.0 010 $a9987-08-266-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000495994 035 $a(EBL)1561398 035 $a(OCoLC)863204207 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001154253 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11948860 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001154253 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11162130 035 $a(PQKB)10880909 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1561398 035 $a(OCoLC)870684277 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse32705 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1561398 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10803476 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000495994 100 $a20120827h20112011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|||||||nn|n 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aChallenges for the democratisation process in Tanzania $emoving towards consolidation 50 years after independence? /$fJonas Ewald 210 1$aDar es Salaam, Tanzania :$cMkuki na Nyota Publishers,$d[2011] 210 4$dİ2011 215 $a1 online resource (378 p.) 300 $aOriginally published as the author's thesis (doctoral)--University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 2011. 311 $a9987-08-250-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aIntroduction -- Theoretical framework : democracy, democratisation and development -- Methodology -- Statism and development from above--Tanzanian development 1961-2010 a brief context -- Sphere 1 : state/state capacity the political institutions and challenges for democratisation within the state -- Sphere 3 and 4 : political institutions outside the state : media, ngos, democratic culture and economic development -- Sphere 3 : political parties--challenges for the opposition -- Political reforms and the 2000 and 2005 elections--the consolidation of electionalism, but not of democracy? -- Concluding discussion -- List of references (selected) -- Selected list of interviews 2000-2007/2010 -- Appendix 1. A profile of the political parties in Tanzania -- Sammanfattning pa? svenska. 330 $aTanzania has been independent in 2011 for 50 years. While most neighbouring states have gone through violent conflicts, Tanzania has managed to implement extensive reforms without armed political conflicts, Hence, Tanzania is an interesting case for Peace and Development research. This dissertation analyses the political development in Tanzania since the introduction of the multiparty system in 1992, with a focus on the challenges for the democratisation process in connection with the 2000 and 2005 elections. The question of to what extent Tanzania had moved towards a consolidation of democracy, is analysed by looking at nine different institutions of importance for democratisation grouped in four spheres: the state, the political, civil and economic society. Focus is on the development of the political society, and the role of the opposition in particular. The analysis is based on secondary and primary material collected between September 2000 to April 2010. The main conclusion is that even if the institutions of liberal democracy have gradually developed, in practice single-party rule has continued, manifested in the 2005 election when the CCM won 92% of seats. Despite impressive economic growth, poverty remains deep and has not been substantially reduced. On a theoretical level this brings the old debate between liberal and substantive democracy back to the fore. Neither the economic nor the political reforms have brought about a transformation of the political and economic system resulting in the poor majority gaining substantially more political influence and improved economic conditions. Hence, it is argued that the interface between the economic, political and administrative reforms has not been sufficiently considered in the liberal democratic tradition. Liberal democracy is necessary for a democratic development, but not sufficient for democracy to be consolidated. For that a substantive democratic development is necessary. 606 $aDemocracy$zTanzania 607 $aTanzania$xPolitics and government 615 0$aDemocracy 676 $a320.967809049 700 $aEwald$b Jonas$01635416 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910814315003321 996 $aChallenges for the democratisation process in Tanzania$93976178 997 $aUNINA