LEADER 03287nam  2200685 a 450 
001 9910814149403321
005 20240712000830.0
010   $a3-11-032606-X
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110326062
035   $a(CKB)2550000001096875
035   $a(EBL)1215597
035   $a(OCoLC)851972143
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000801503
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11457074
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000801503
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10774028
035   $a(PQKB)10112565
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1215597
035   $a(DE-B1597)211481
035   $a(OCoLC)1013967161
035   $a(OCoLC)853262486
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110326062
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1215597
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10728719
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL503409
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001096875
100   $a20130717d2009      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aPhenomenological realism versus scientific realism $eReinhardt Grossmann - David M. Armstrong metaphysical correspondence /$fJavier Cumpa & Erwin Tegtmeier (eds.)
210   $aFrankfurt $cOntos Verlag$d2009
215   $a1 online resource (145 p.)
225 0 $aPhilosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis ;$v32
225  0$aPhilosophische Analyse ;$vBd. 32
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-11-032524-1 
311   $a1-299-72158-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter --$tTable of contents --$tAcknowledgements --$tPreface /$rArmstrong, D. M. --$tIntroduction --$tBeginning: universals --$tMiddle: laws of nature --$tEnd: the nature of numbers --$tAppendices --$t1. Reinhardt Grossmann's Ontology /$rArmstrong, David M. --$t2. Comments on Armstrong's "Universals" /$rGrossmann, Reinhardt --$t3. Comments on Grossmann's "The Existence of the World" /$rArmstrong, David M. --$tBibliography --$tAbout Reinhardt Grossmann (1931, Germany) --$tAbout David M. Armstrong (1926, Australia) --$tAbout the Editors --$tAuthor Index --$tSubject Index --$tBackmatter
330   $aThe two eminent metaphysicians Armstrong and Grossmann exchanged letters for ten years in which they discussed crucial points of their respective ontologies. They have a common basis. Both do metaphysics proper and not linguistic philosophy. Both advocate universals and acknowledge the key position of the category of states of affairs. However, they differ on the simplicity of universals and the nature of states of affairs. There is also a fundamental methodological disagreement between them. Armstrong accepts only the evidence of natural science and has a materialist view on mind while Grossm
410  0$aPhilosophische Analyse / Philosophical Analysis
606   $aPhenomenalism
606   $aScience
606   $aRealism
615  0$aPhenomenalism.
615  0$aScience.
615  0$aRealism.
676   $a110
701   $aCumpa$b Javier$f1983-.$01617584
701   $aTegtmeier$b Erwin$0554870
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910814149403321
996   $aPhenomenological realism versus scientific realism$94025179
997   $aUNINA