LEADER 02089oam 2200613 450 001 9910707331203321 005 20160822145922.0 035 $a(CKB)5470000002464208 035 $a(OCoLC)681394458$z(OCoLC)54498182$z(OCoLC)624414674 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002464208 100 $a20101115j200303 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurmn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aLichen communities indicator results from Idaho $ebaseline sampling /$fPeter Neitlich, Paul Rogers, Roger Rosentreter 210 1$aFort Collins, CO :$cUnited States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station,$dMarch 2003. 215 $a1 online resource (14 pages) $cillustrations (chiefly color) 225 1 $aGeneral technical report RMRS ;$vGTR-103 300 $aTitle from title screen (viewed August 22, 2016). 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 13-14). 517 $aLichen communities indicator results from Idaho 606 $aEpiphytic lichens$zIdaho 606 $aLichen communities$zIdaho 606 $aPlant indicators$zIdaho 606 $aEpiphytic lichens$2fast 606 $aLichen communities$2fast 606 $aPlant indicators$2fast 607 $aIdaho$2fast 615 0$aEpiphytic lichens 615 0$aLichen communities 615 0$aPlant indicators 615 7$aEpiphytic lichens. 615 7$aLichen communities. 615 7$aPlant indicators. 700 $aNeitlich$b Peter$01407557 702 $aRogers$b Paul C$g(Paul Christopher),$f1961- 702 $aRosentreter$b Roger$f1951- 712 02$aRocky Mountain Research Station (Fort Collins, Colo.), 801 0$bOCLCE 801 1$bOCLCE 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bBUF 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCF 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910707331203321 996 $aLichen communities indicator results from Idaho$93513220 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04082nam 2200589 450 001 9910813881503321 005 20230126214645.0 010 $a1-5017-0687-X 024 7 $a10.7591/9781501706349 035 $a(CKB)3710000000884723 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4713551 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001660813 035 $a(OCoLC)960833795 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse54721 035 $a(DE-B1597)478727 035 $a(OCoLC)979911534 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501706349 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4713551 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11278024 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL960717 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000884723 100 $a20161019h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aClearing the air $ethe rise and fall of smoking in the workplace /$fGregory Wood 210 1$aIthaca, New York ;$aLondon, [England] :$cILR Press,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (257 pages) 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-5017-0482-6 311 $a1-5017-0634-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction: Nicotine and Working-Class History --$t1. Reformers, Employers, and the Dangers of Working-Class Smoking --$t2. Smoking Bans and Shop Floor Resistance during the Early Twentieth Century --$t3. Workers, Management, and the Right to Smoke during World War II --$t4. Antismoking Politics in Postwar Workplaces --$t5. "Exiled Smoking" and the Making of Smoke-Free Workplaces --$t6. Organized Labor and the Problem of "Smokers' Rights" --$tConclusion: Quitting Smoking and the Endurance of Nicotine --$tNotes --$tIndex 330 $aIn Clearing the Air, Gregory Wood examines smoking's importance to the social and cultural history of working people in the twentieth-century United States. Now that most workplaces in the United States are smoke-free, it may be difficult to imagine the influence that nicotine addiction once had on the politics of worker resistance, workplace management, occupational health, vice, moral reform, grassroots activism, and the labor movement. The experiences, social relations, demands, and disputes that accompanied smoking in the workplace in turn shaped the histories of antismoking politics and tobacco control.The steady expansion of cigarette smoking among men, women, and children during the first half of the twentieth century brought working people into sustained conflict with managers' demands for diligent attention to labor processes and work rules. Addiction to nicotine led smokers to resist and challenge policies that coldly stood between them and the cigarettes they craved. Wood argues that workers' varying abilities to smoke on the job stemmed from the success or failure of sustained opposition to employer policies that restricted or banned smoking. During World War II, workers in defense industries, for example, struck against workplace smoking bans. By the 1970s, opponents of smoking in workplaces began to organize, and changing medical knowledge and dwindling union power contributed further to the downfall of workplace smoking. The demise of the ability to smoke on the job over the past four decades serves as an important indicator of how the power of workers' influence in labor-management relations has dwindled over the same period. 606 $aSmoking in the workplace$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aAntismoking movement$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aSmoking$xSocial aspects$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 615 0$aSmoking in the workplace$xHistory 615 0$aAntismoking movement$xHistory 615 0$aSmoking$xSocial aspects$xHistory 676 $a331.256 700 $aWood$b Gregory$f1973-$01677332 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910813881503321 996 $aClearing the air$94044138 997 $aUNINA