LEADER 03088nam  2200649 a 450 
001 9910813336603321
005 20240516082416.0
010   $a1-283-17492-8
010   $a9786613174925
010   $a90-272-8698-1
035   $a(CKB)2550000000040005
035   $a(OCoLC)746925416
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10481831
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000525334
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12222205
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000525334
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10488911
035   $a(PQKB)11008943
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL730308
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10481831
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL317492
035   $a(OCoLC)741492697
035   $a(PPN)190585501
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC730308
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000000040005
100   $a20110201d2011      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aResumptive pronouns at the interfaces /$fedited by Alain Rouveret
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2011
215   $a1 online resource (437 p.) 
225 1 $aLanguage faculty and beyond,$x1877-6531 ;$vv. 5
300   $a"This volume is based on a round table on resumptive pronouns which was held at the UFR de Linguistique, Universite? Paris-Diderot, on June 21 and 22, 2007."
311   $a90-272-0822-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes.
327   $apt. 1. Syntactic uniformity/diversity of resumption -- pt. 2. Issues in the semantics of resumptive pronouns and epithets.
330   $aThis article focuses on the distribution and interpretation of resumption in Jordanian Arabic with respect to a well-known distinction: weak (clitics and doubled pronouns) versus strong (strong pronouns and epithets) resumption. We propose an analysis of resumption and reconstruction that relates two major asymmetries with respect to that distinction, (i) strong resumption banning QP antecedents in non-island contexts, contrary to weak resumption, and (ii) strong resumption banning reconstruction in strong island contexts, contrary to weak resumption. Our main conclusion is that weak (functional) resumptives support two distributive readings, either bound variable or e- type, whereas strong (lexical) resumptives can only get an e-type interpretation. The asymmetries stated above then just follow from further constraints on the two distributive readings.
410  0$aLanguage faculty and beyond ;$vv. 5.
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPronoun
606   $aGenerative grammar
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xPronoun.
615  0$aGenerative grammar.
676   $a415/.55
701   $aRouveret$b Alain$0734633
712 02$aCentre national de la recherche scientifique (France)
712 02$aUniversite? de Paris VII.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910813336603321
996   $aResumptive pronouns at the interfaces$93938953
997   $aUNINA