LEADER 04367oam 22006615 450 001 9910813130803321 005 20240112211143.0 010 $a0-8047-8209-1 024 7 $a10.1515/9780804782098 035 $a(CKB)2670000000155442 035 $a(EBL)865089 035 $a(OCoLC)779141561 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000660750 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12264892 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000660750 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10707373 035 $a(PQKB)10261347 035 $a(DE-B1597)563783 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780804782098 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC865089 035 $a(OCoLC)1178769036 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000155442 100 $a20200723h20202012 fy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|nu---|u||u 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAdaptable autocrats $eregime power in Egypt and Syria /$fJoshua Stacher 210 1$aStanford, CA :$cStanford University Press,$d[2020] 210 4$dİ2012 215 $a1 online resource (241 pages) 225 0 $aStanford Studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic Societies and Cultures 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 0 $a0-8047-8062-5 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tAbbreviations and Acronyms --$tIntroduction. Changing to Stay the Same --$t1. Debating Authoritarianism --$t2. The Origins of Executive Authority --$t3. Adaptation and Elite Co-optation --$t4. Adaptation and Nonelite Co-optation --$t5. The 2011 Uprisings and the Future of Autocratic Adaptation --$tNotes --$tReferences --$tIndex 330 $aThe decades-long resilience of Middle Eastern regimes meant that few anticipated the 2011 Arab Spring. But from the seemingly rapid leadership turnovers in Tunisia and Egypt to the protracted stalemates in Yemen and Syria, there remains a common outcome: ongoing control of the ruling regimes. While some analysts and media outlets rush to look for democratic breakthroughs, autocratic continuity?not wide-ranging political change?remains the hallmark of the region's upheaval. Contrasting Egypt and Syria, Joshua Stacher examines how executive power is structured in each country to show how these preexisting power configurations shaped the uprisings and, in turn, the outcomes. Presidential power in Egypt was centralized. Even as Mubarak was forced to relinquish the presidency, military generals from the regime were charged with leading the transition. The course of the Syrian uprising reveals a key difference: the decentralized character of Syrian politics. Only time will tell if Asad will survive in office, but for now, the regime continues to unify around him. While debates about election timetables, new laws, and the constitution have come about in Egypt, bloody street confrontations continue to define Syrian politics?the differences in authoritarian rule could not be more stark. Political structures, elite alliances, state institutions, and governing practices are seldom swept away entirely?even following successful revolutions?so it is vital to examine the various contexts for regime survival. Elections, protests, and political struggles will continue to define the region in the upcoming years. Examining the lead-up to the Egyptian and Syrian uprisings helps us unlock the complexity behind the protests and transitions. Without this understanding, we lack a roadmap to make sense of the Middle East's most important political moment in decades. 410 0$aStanford studies in Middle Eastern and Islamic societies and cultures. 606 $aAuthoritarianism$zEgypt 606 $aAuthoritarianism$zSyria 606 $aComparative government 606 $aDictatorship$zEgypt 606 $aDictatorship$zSyria 607 $aEgypt$xPolitics and government$y1981- 607 $aSyria$xPolitics and government$y2000- 615 0$aAuthoritarianism 615 0$aAuthoritarianism 615 0$aComparative government. 615 0$aDictatorship 615 0$aDictatorship 676 $a956.7104/2 700 $aStacher$b Joshua$f1975-$4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$01632812 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910813130803321 996 $aAdaptable autocrats$93972236 997 $aUNINA