LEADER 03463nam 2200613 450 001 9910813032303321 005 20230617015334.0 010 $a0-8047-9636-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9780804796361 035 $a(CKB)3710000000358473 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001440503 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11830733 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001440503 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11391604 035 $a(PQKB)11006265 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1977044 035 $a(DE-B1597)563768 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780804796361 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1977044 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11025120 035 $a(OCoLC)903930130 035 $a(OCoLC)1198931456 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000358473 100 $a20150310h20042004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aIvory tower and industrial innovation $euniversity-industry technology transfer before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States /$fDavid C. Mowery [and three others] 210 1$aStanford, California :$cStanford Business Books,$d2004. 210 4$dİ2004 215 $a1 online resource (258 pages) $cillustrations 225 0 $aInnovation and technology in the world economy Ivory tower and industrial innovation 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-8047-9529-0 311 $a0-8047-4920-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tTables and Figures --$tAcknowledgments --$t1. Introduction: The Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation --$t2. Historical Overview: American Universities and Technical Progress in Industry --$t3. University Patent Policies and University Patenting Before the Bayh-Dole Act --$t4. The Research Corporation and University Technology Licensing, 1912?80 --$t5. A Political History of the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 --$t6. The Bayh-Dole Act and Patenting and Licensing at the University of California, Stanford University, and Columbia University --$t7. The Effects of Entry and Experience on U.S. University Patenting Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act --$t8 What Happens in University-Industry Technology Transfer? --$t9. Conclusion --$tNotes --$tReferences --$tIndex 330 $aSince the early 1980's, universities in the United States have greatly expanded their patenting and licensing activities. The Congressional Joint Economic Committee, among other authorities, have argued that this surge contributed to the economic boom of the 1990's. And, many observers have attributed this trend to the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980. Using quantitative analysis and detailed case studies, this book tests that conventional wisdom and assesses the effects of the Act, examining the diverse channels through which commercialization has occurred over the 20th century and since the passage of the Act. 606 $aTechnology transfer$zUnited States 606 $aAcademic-industrial collaboration$zUnited States 615 0$aTechnology transfer 615 0$aAcademic-industrial collaboration 676 $a338.973/06 700 $aMowery$b David C., $4aut$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut$089083 702 $aMowery$b David C. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910813032303321 996 $aIvory tower and industrial innovation$94105673 997 $aUNINA