LEADER 03321nam  2200673 a 450 
001 9910812686803321
005 20240506023415.0
010   $a979-82-16-18664-9
010   $a1-4408-2658-7
010   $a1-282-40522-5
010   $a9786612405228
010   $a0-313-01926-6
024 7 $a10.5040/9798216186649
035   $a(CKB)1000000000000694
035   $a(EBL)492321
035   $a(OCoLC)55002856
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000277002
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11237847
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000277002
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10232994
035   $a(PQKB)10127605
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL492321
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10018026
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL240522
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC492321
035   $a(OCoLC)40838651
035   $a(DLC)BP9798216186649BC
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000000694
100   $a19990212d2000      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aArmy relations with Congress $ethick armor, dull sword, slow horse /$fStephen K. Scroggs
205   $a1st ed.
210  1$aWestport, Conn. :$cPrager,$d2000.
210  2$aLondon :$cBloomsbury Publishing,$d2024
215   $a1 online resource (288 p.)
225 1 $aNon-Series
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-275-96176-1 
311   $a0-275-96175-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [253]-254) and index.
327   $aContents; Preface; Acknowledgments; 1. Introduction: Liaising versus Lobbying; 2. Roles of Legislative Liaison and Military Service Liaisers; 3. Patterns of Army-Congressional Relations; 4. Army Cultural Dimensions: An Inward-Looking Team Player; 5. M1A1 Tank Transfer: Culture Impedes Army Effectiveness on the Hill; 6. Findings and Recommendations; Epilogue; Appendix A: Research Interviews (as of 1995); Appendix B: Washington Experience Leadership Sample Comparisons for U.S. Military Services in 1995: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Tables 4-1-4.4
327   $aAppendix C: Army Washington Experience Leadership Sample Run, 1980-81 Era: Data Used in Compilation of Figures Used for Table 4-5For Further Reading; Index; A; B; C; D; E; F; G; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W; Z
330   $a Relying on extensive candid interviews from members of Congress and staff on defense authorization committees and senior Army general officers, Scroggs provides a strong insider analysis with recommendations.  He examines the impact of culture on the varying abilities of public agencies, specifically the Army, to pursue its organizational interests through lobbying or liaising Congress. Scroggs argues that despite structural similarities in how the four military services approach Congress, differences in service culture affect their relative success in achieving their goals on the Hill.    Sc
410  0$aNon-Series
606   $aCivil-military relations$zUnited States
615  0$aCivil-military relations
676   $a322/.5/0973
700   $aScroggs$b Stephen K.$f1954-$01646691
801  0$bDLC
801  1$bDLC
801  2$bDLC
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910812686803321
996   $aArmy relations with Congress$93993816
997   $aUNINA