LEADER 03686nam 22006614a 450 001 9910812562803321 005 20220302182408.0 010 $a1-282-40109-2 010 $a9786612401091 010 $a90-474-2834-X 024 7 $a10.1163/ej.9789004174887.1-224 035 $a(CKB)1000000000806700 035 $a(EBL)468508 035 $a(OCoLC)570348933 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000337349 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11297313 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000337349 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10288743 035 $a(PQKB)10904848 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC468508 035 $a(OCoLC)310394004 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789047428343 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL468508 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10349295 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL240109 035 $a(PPN)174398778 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000806700 100 $a20090827d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEscaping the self-determination trap$b[electronic resource] /$fby Marc Weller 210 $aLeiden ;$aBoston $cMartinus Nijhoff$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (224 p.) 225 0 $aNijhoff eBook titles 2009 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-17488-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and bibliography (p. 171-224). 327 $aA concept with multiple meanings -- The classical right to self-determination -- Constitutional self-determination -- Remedial self-determination -- Effective entities -- Trading self-determination for autonomy or enhanced self-governance -- Regionalisation, federalisation, or union with confirmation of territorial unity -- Deferring a substantive settlement while agreeing to a settlement mechanism -- Balancing self-determination claims -- Conditional self-determination -- Agreeing on self-determination but deferring implementation -- Establishing a de facto state through an international process -- Supervised independence -- Conclusion : new approaches to self-determination settlements. 330 $aThere is new movement in the discussion about self-determination and statehood. The contested declaration of independence by Kosovo and Russia?s recognition of the purported independence of Abkhasia and South Ossetia have caused significant controversy. These developments may well put an end to the attempt by governments to keep in place the highly restricted doctrine of self-determination that has previously only been made available in the colonial context. This monograph argues that classical self-determination, narrowly conceived in the colonial context. cannot contribute to the resolution of the presently ongoing self-determination conflicts around the world. However, this study finds that over the past few years a new practice of addressing self-determination conflicts has emerged. This practice significantly extends our understanding of the legal right to self-determination and of the means that can be brought to bear in terminating secessionist conflicts. 606 $aSelf-determination, National 606 $aNationalities, Principle of 607 $aCyprus$xInternational status 607 $aKosovo$xInternational status 607 $aAbkhazia (Georgia)$xInternational status 615 0$aSelf-determination, National. 615 0$aNationalities, Principle of. 676 $a341.26 700 $aWeller$b M$g(Marc)$0266586 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910812562803321 996 $aEscaping the self-determination trap$93991527 997 $aUNINA