LEADER 04373nam 2200721 a 450 001 9910812558503321 005 20240514061425.0 010 $a1-283-35949-9 010 $a9786613359490 010 $a90-272-8035-5 035 $a(CKB)2550000000072952 035 $a(EBL)805810 035 $a(OCoLC)769342213 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000551681 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11941083 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000551681 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10526868 035 $a(PQKB)10108923 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC805810 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL805810 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10517165 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000072952 100 $a19840229d1983 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMeaning and reading $ea philosophical essay on language and literature /$fMichel Meyer 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins$d1983 215 $a1 online resource (186 p.) 225 1 $aPragmatics & beyond,$x0166-6258 ;$v4:3 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-2515-X 320 $aBibliography: p. [173]-176. 327 $aMEANING AND READING A Philosophical Essay on Language and Literature; Editorial page; Title page; Copyright page; Table of contents; Acknowledgements; 0. INTRODUCTION; 1. THE CLASSICAL CONCEPTION OF MEANING AND ITS SHORTCOMINGS; 1.1. Meaning in a literary setting; 1.2. The arguments for the defense; 1.3. More about the propositional theory of language and its semantic consequences: the Xerox theory of meaning; 1.4. Context matters; 2. TOWARD AN INTEGRATED THEORY OF MEANING; 2.1. The question of the validity of the substitution view; 2.2. The problematological view of language 327 $a2.3. The problematological theory of reference2.3.4. Reference and its mention; 2.4. Reference and meaning; 2.5. From substitutions to questions; 2.6. Is meaning really substitutional?; 2.7. Conclusion; 3. THE RHETORIC OF TEXTUALITY; 3.1. Textual meaning is rhetorical; 3.2. Rhetoric and argumentation; 3.3. Why should rhetoric (argumentation) be problematologically conceptualized?; 3.4. Literary versus non-literary discourse; 3.5. What is literature; 4. IDEAS AND IDEOLOGY; 4.1. The nature of ideas; 4.2. Ideas and questions in Plato's theory; 4.3. Ideas and political ideologies 327 $a4.4. The logic of ideology5. THE NATURE OF LITERARINESS; 5.1. Ideas and textuality; 5.2. Literature and political ideology; 5.3. The dialectics of fiction; 5.4. Fiction and reality; 5.5. Literary forms as means of materializing the problematological difference; 5.6. The birth of the novel: Don Quixote as an illustration; 5.7. Conclusion; 6.THE INTERPRETATIVE PROCE; 6.1.Beyond traditions and omissions; 6.2. Answerhood as meaning; 6.3. The hermeneutic question and its answer; 6.4. Textuality as the meeting point of poetics and hermeneutics 327 $a6.5. Where do we find the questions answered by a text?6.6. Textual dialectics; FOOTNOTES; NOTES; REFERENCES 330 $aAccording to the traditional view, meaning presents itself under the form of some kind of identity. To give the meaning of a sentence amounts to being capable of producing some substitute based on the identity of the terms of the sentence. Is then the meaning of a book, or of any text, the capacity of rewriting it? Instead of retaining a double-standard theory of meaning, one for sentences and another for texts, that would allow for an ad hoc gap, the author provides a unified conception, called the question view of language he has developed, known as problematology. He pursues a 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$v4:3. 606 $aSemantics 606 $aDiscourse analysis, Literary 606 $aLiterature$xPhilosophy 606 $aRhetoric 606 $aIdeology 606 $aHermeneutics 615 0$aSemantics. 615 0$aDiscourse analysis, Literary. 615 0$aLiterature$xPhilosophy. 615 0$aRhetoric. 615 0$aIdeology. 615 0$aHermeneutics. 676 $a808/.00141 700 $aMeyer$b Michel$f1950-$058789 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910812558503321 996 $aMeaning and reading$94114963 997 $aUNINA