LEADER 05369nam 2200613 450 001 9910812535603321 005 20230803205917.0 010 $a3-8382-6694-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000000271772 035 $a(EBL)1801721 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001559653 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16191002 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001559653 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14824234 035 $a(PQKB)10901233 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1801721 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000271772 100 $a20150314h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe European Union's democratization policy for Central Asia $efailed in success or succeeded in failure? /$fVera Axyonova 210 1$aStuttgart, Germany :$cibidem-Verlag,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (211 p.) 225 1 $aInterdisciplinary Series of the Centre for Intercultural and European Studies,$x1865-2255 ;$vVolume 11 =$aInterdisziplina?re Schriftenreihe des Centrums fu?r interkulturelle und europa?ische Studien ;$vBand 11 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-8382-0694-0 311 $a3-8382-0614-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aEditorial; Foreword; Acknowledgements; Contents; Abbreviations; 1. Introduction; 2. European Union as an External Democracy Promoter: Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations; 2.1 Conceptualizing the EU as a Normative Actor; 2.1.1 EU-Level Normative Commitments; 2.1.2 The EU Conception of External Democracy Promotion; 2.2 In Search for an Appropriate Theoretical Framework: Explaining External Factors of Democratization; 2.3 Towards a Comprehensive Typology of EU Democracy Promotion Tools; 2.3.1 Categorizing Democratization Tools: An Overview of Existing Typologies 327 $a2.3.2 Building-up a Distinct Typology3. Evaluation of EU Democracy Promotion: A Framework for Analysis; 3.1 Evaluating Successes and Failures of External Democracy Promotion; 3.1.1 Existing Approaches; 3.1.2 Methodological Challenges in the Context of the Current Study; 3.1.3 Opting for a Distinct Research Strategy; 3.2 Explaining Successes and Failures of External Democracy Promotion; 3.2.1 What Factors Matter?; 3.2.2 The EU Engagement in Central Asia: Main Assumptions; 3.3 Further Methodological Considerations; 4. The EU Sanctions Against Uzbekistan 327 $a4.1 Tracing Implementation of the Sanctions4.1.1 The EU Sanctions and Conditions for Their Withdrawal; 4.1.2 The EU Sanctions at Work; 4.1.3 Summary of the Results; 4.2 Explaining the Outcomes of EU Sanctions; 4.2.1 Lack of Credibility as an Explanation for Failure; 4.2.2 Substance of the EU Demands and Their Implications as Explanatory Factors; 4.2.3 Possible Interfering Effects; 4.3 Concluding Remarks; 5. Structured Human Rights Dialogues; 5.1 Tracing Implementation of the Dialogues; 5.1.1 The Issues in Focus of the HRDs; 5.1.2 Evaluating the Results: What Has (Not) Been Achieved 327 $a5.2 Explaining the Outcomes: Multiple Causes of Failure5.2.1 Process-related Factors; 5.2.2 Substance of the Promoted Norms; 5.3 Concluding Remarks; 6. The Institution Building and Partnership Programme and the European Instrument for Democracy and Human Rights; 6.1 Tracing Implementation of the Programmes; 6.1.1 The IBPP at Work; 6.1.2 The EIDHR at Work; 6.1.3 Summary of the Results; 6.2 Explaining the Outcomes of the IBPP and EIDHR Application; 6.2.1 Assistance Transparency and Ownership; 6.2.2 Substance of the Promoted Norms; 6.3 Concluding Remarks; 7. Conclusion; References 327 $aAnnex I: List of Expert InterviewsAnnex II: IBPP Projects implemented in Kyrgyzstan in 2002-2009; Annex III: IBPP Projects implemented in Uzbekistan in 2003-2010; Annex IV: EIDHR Regional Projects implemented in Central Asia in 2003-2010; Annex V: EIDHR Macro- and Micro-Projects (CBSS) implemented in Kyrgyzstan in 2004-2010 330 $aThe European Union has developed a range of instruments to promote democracy and human rights worldwide. However, the success of its democratization efforts remains questionable in countries that lack an EU membership perspective. The case of post-soviet Central Asia, where the EU declares democracy promotion among its key priorities yet is confronted with unfavorable domestic conditions for democratization and often fails to follow through, is an eye-opening example. Vera Axyonova's study offers the first comprehensive evaluation of the micro-level effects of the EU engagement in Kyrgyzstan a 410 0$aInterdisciplinary series of the Centre for Intercultural and European Studies ;$vVolume 11. 606 $aDemocratization$xGovernment policy$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aDemocratization$xGovernment policy$zAsia, Central 606 $aEuropean Union$xPolitics and government 615 0$aDemocratization$xGovernment policy 615 0$aDemocratization$xGovernment policy 615 0$aEuropean Union$xPolitics and government. 676 $a327.11 700 $aAxyonova$b Vera$01151383 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910812535603321 996 $aThe European Union's democratization policy for Central Asia$94031021 997 $aUNINA