LEADER 03903oam 22008295 450 001 9910812166403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-280-85781-1 010 $a9786610857814 010 $a0-8213-7089-8 024 7 $a10.1596/978-0-8213-7088-9 035 $a(CKB)1000000000289699 035 $a(EBL)459427 035 $a(OCoLC)154236244 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000087908 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11998562 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000087908 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10054216 035 $a(PQKB)11069335 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC459427 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL459427 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10176220 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL85781 035 $a(OCoLC)150435258 035 $a(OCoLC)ocn150435258 035 $a(US-djbf)14979193 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000289699 100 $a20070824d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aLand reform and farm restructuring in transition countries : $ethe experience of Bulgaria, Moldova, Azerbaijan, and Kazakhstan /$fNora Dudwick, Karin Fock, David Sedik 210 1$aWashington, DC :$cWorld Bank,$d2007. 215 $a1 online resource (xviii, 87 pages) $cillustrations ;$d26 cm 225 1 $aWorld Bank working paper,$x1726-5878 ;$vno. 104 225 0$aWorld Bank working paper,$x1726-5878 ;$vno. 104 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8213-7088-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 85-87). 327 $aContents; Acknowledgments; Executive Summary; Introduction; LIST OF BOXES; 1. Bulgaria: With Good Overall Prospects, Good Agricultural Policy, and Good Governance Indicators,Why Are Bulgarian Rural Households So Badly Off?; LIST OF FIGURES; LIST OF TABLES; 2. Moldova: With a Well-designed Land Reform Shaped Greatly by Donors, Why Have Farms in Moldova Not Performed Better?; 3. Azerbaijan: With Some of the Poorest Governance Indicators in the CIS, How Did Azerbaijan Implement a Land Reform that Was Viewed by Farmers as Quite Fair and that Led to a Substantial Increase in 327 $a4. Kazakhstan: Why Does Kazakhstan Have Surprising Results from a Poor Reform?5. General Conclusions and Implications for Policy; Appendixes; References 330 $aIn the past fifteen years, most countries of Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States have shifted from predominantly collective to more individualized agriculture. These years also have witnessed the largest fall in agricultural production, yields, and rural employment on record, while the deterioration and dissolution of collective and state farms have been accompanied by a significant drop in rural public services. Land Reform and Farm Restructuring provides a structured and comparative review of important aspects of land reform and documents important differenc 410 0$aWorld Bank e-Library. 606 $aLand reform$zFormer Soviet republics 606 $aAgriculture and state$zFormer Soviet republics 606 $aLand reform$zBulgaria 606 $aLand reform$zMoldova 606 $aLand reform$zAzerbaijan 606 $aLand reform$zKazakhstan 615 0$aLand reform 615 0$aAgriculture and state 615 0$aLand reform 615 0$aLand reform 615 0$aLand reform 615 0$aLand reform 676 $a323.3/147 700 $aDudwick$b Nora$01106721 701 $aFock$b Karin$01628604 701 $aSedik$b David J$01628605 801 0$bVYF 801 1$bVYF 801 2$bSUC 801 2$bBTCTA 801 2$bAGL 801 2$bBAKER 801 2$bDLC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910812166403321 996 $aLand reform and farm restructuring in transition countries$93965802 997 $aUNINA