LEADER 04365nam 22007214a 450 001 9910811738103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-292-79739-7 024 7 $a10.7560/702295 035 $a(CKB)1000000000453882 035 $a(OCoLC)182530566 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10172731 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000195807 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11203806 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000195807 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10131174 035 $a(PQKB)10574158 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3442997 035 $a(OCoLC)60567348 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse2078 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3442997 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10172731 035 $a(DE-B1597)586829 035 $a(OCoLC)1280943508 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780292797390 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000453882 100 $a20030723d2004 ub 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMaking Ecuadorian histories $efour centuries of defining power /$fO. Hugo Benavides 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aAustin $cUniversity of Texas Press$d2004 215 $a1 online resource (252 p.) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-292-70229-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 195-226) and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tCONTENTS -- $tACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- $tINTRODUCTION -- $tOne ECUADOR?S POLITICAL HEGEMONY National and Racial Histories -- $tTwo THE ECUADORIANIZATION OF AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE National Identity at Cochasquí -- $tThree NATIONAL MECHANISMS OF APPROPRIATION History, Territory, Gender, and Race at Cochasquí -- $tFour BETWEEN FOUCAULT AND A NAKED MAN Racing Class, Sex, and Gender to the Nation?s Past -- $tFive ALTERNATIVE HISTORIES The Indian Movement?s Encounter with Hegemony -- $tSix THE PRINT MEDIA? S CONTRIBUTION TO NATIONAL HISTORY Who Owns the Past? -- $tSeven CONCLUSION Power, Hegemony, and National Identity -- $tREFERENCES -- $tINDEX 330 $aIn Ecuador, as in all countries, archaeology and history play fundamental roles in defining national identity. Connecting with the prehistoric and historic pasts gives the modern state legitimacy and power. But the state is not the only actor that lays claim to the country's archaeological patrimony, nor is its official history the only version of the story. Indigenous peoples are increasingly drawing on the past to claim their rights and standing in the modern Ecuadorian state, while the press tries to present a "neutral" version of history that will satisfy its various publics. This pathfinding book investigates how archaeological knowledge is used for both maintaining and contesting nation-building and state-hegemony in Ecuador. Specifically, Hugo Benavides analyzes how the pre-Hispanic site of Cochasquí has become a source of competing narratives of Native American, Spanish, and Ecuadorian occupations, which serve the differing needs of the nation-state and different national populations at large. He also analyzes the Indian movement itself and the recent controversy over the final resting place for the traditional monolith of San Biritute. Offering a more nuanced view of the production of history than previous studies, Benavides demonstrates how both official and resistance narratives are constantly reproduced and embodied within the nation-state's dominant discourses. 606 $aIndians of South America$zEcuador$xAntiquities 606 $aIndians of South America$zEcuador$xHistoriography 606 $aArchaeology$zEcuador$xHistory 606 $aNational characteristics, Ecuadorian 606 $aPolitical anthropology$zEcuador 607 $aEcuador$xHistoriography 607 $aEcuador$xAntiquities 607 $aEcuador$xPolitics and government 615 0$aIndians of South America$xAntiquities. 615 0$aIndians of South America$xHistoriography. 615 0$aArchaeology$xHistory. 615 0$aNational characteristics, Ecuadorian. 615 0$aPolitical anthropology 676 $a986.6/01/072 700 $aBenavides$b O. Hugo$g(Oswald Hugo),$f1968-$01595952 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910811738103321 996 $aMaking Ecuadorian histories$93990300 997 $aUNINA