LEADER 03314nam 2200637Ia 450 001 9910811501303321 005 20221206212946.0 010 $a1-299-45333-3 010 $a0-7425-7686-8 035 $a(CKB)2550000001039668 035 $a(EBL)1165063 035 $a(OCoLC)855502987 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000860174 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12354760 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000860174 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10897768 035 $a(PQKB)11489039 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1165063 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1165063 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10685438 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL476583 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001039668 100 $a20040204e20072004 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture $ean ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning /$fKenneth Liberman 205 $a1st paperback ed. 210 $aLanham, MD $cRowman & Littlefield Publishers$d2007,c2004 215 $a1 online resource (338 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-7425-5612-3 311 $a0-7425-2744-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright Page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Part I: A Postcolonial Inquiry into Tibetan Dialectics; 1. Orientalism and Tibetological Praxis; 2. Ethnomethodology and the Retrieval of Ordinary Society; 3. The Organization of Reasoning in Tibetan Philosophical Debates; Part II: Philosophical Praxis in the Tibetan Academy; 4. Organizing the Objectivity of the Discourse: Dialectics and Communication; 5. Reason as a Public Activity; 6. Rhymes and Reason: Reason as the In Vivo, Concerted Work of Tibetan Philosophers; 7. Strategies in Tibetan Philosophical Debates 327 $aPart III: A Sociology of Reasoning8. Using Reasons: Capabilities of Formal Analysis; 9. Some Betrayals of Formal Analysis; Bibliography; Index 330 $aTibetan Buddhist scholar-monks have long engaged in face-to-face public philosophical debates. This original study challenges Orientalist text-based scholarship, which has missed these lived practices of Tibetan dialectics. Kenneth Liberman brings these dynamic disputations to life for the modern reader through a richly detailed, turn-by-turn analysis of the monks' formal philosophical reasoning. He argues that Tibetan Buddhists deliberately organize their debates into formal structures that both empower and constrain thinking, skillfully using logic as an interactional tool to organize their 606 $aBuddhism$xSocial aspects 606 $aBuddhist philosophy 606 $aDebates and debating$xReligious aspects$xBuddhism 606 $aPhilosophy, Tibetan 615 0$aBuddhism$xSocial aspects. 615 0$aBuddhist philosophy. 615 0$aDebates and debating$xReligious aspects$xBuddhism. 615 0$aPhilosophy, Tibetan. 676 $a184/.1 700 $aLiberman$b Kenneth$f1948-$01617196 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910811501303321 996 $aDialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture$93948273 997 $aUNINA