LEADER 03029nam 2200481 450 001 9910811420403321 005 20230124194009.0 010 $a90-04-31523-3 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004315235 035 $a(CKB)3710000001084415 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4825543 035 $a2016054350 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004315235 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001084415 100 $a20210425d2017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aWhen historiography met epistemology $esophisticated histories and philosophies of science in French-speaking countries in the second half of the nineteenth century /$fby Stefano Bordoni 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d[2017] 215 $a1 online resource (347 pages) 225 0 $aHistory of modern science,$x2352-7145 ;$v2 311 $a90-04-31522-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aPreliminary Material -- Introduction: The Emergence of an Intellectual Stream -- Critical Analyses of Scientific Method -- Between Experimentalism and Mild Naturalism -- Different Attitudes Towards Reductionism -- Mathematics and Determinism -- Scientists and Philosophers on Determinism -- Naïve versus Sophisticated Meta-theoretical Frameworks -- Histories of Ancient Science and Mathematics -- From Theoretical Physics to Meta-theoretical Commitments -- Scientific Practice between Metaphysics and Experiments -- Conclusion -- Afterword: Disappearances and Questionable Reappearances -- References -- Index to Names. 330 $aIn When Historiography Met Epistemology , Stefano Bordoni shows the emergence of sophisticated histories and philosophies of science in French speaking countries in the second half of the nineteenth century. That process involved mathematicians, scientists, and philosophers, and was deeply linked to other processes that transformed the cultural and material landscape of Europe. In the literature, the emergence of the history and philosophy of science is chronologically associated with the turn of the twentieth century: the author points out that this meaningful starting point should be moved backwards. Since the 1860s, sophisticated histories of science and critical meta-theoretical remarks on scientific practice began to compete with naïve historical reconstructions and dogmatic views on science. 410 0$aHistory of Modern Science$v2. 606 $aScience$xPhilosophy$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aScience$zFrance$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aCivilization, Modern$xFrench influences 615 0$aScience$xPhilosophy$xHistory 615 0$aScience$xHistory 615 0$aCivilization, Modern$xFrench influences. 676 $a501 700 $aBordoni$b Stefano$f1989-$053831 801 0$bNL-LeKB 801 1$bNL-LeKB 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910811420403321 996 $aWhen historiography met epistemology$91749274 997 $aUNINA