LEADER 04049nam 22006975 450 001 9910810840203321 005 20230803202649.0 010 $a1-4798-2130-6 024 7 $a10.18574/9781479821303 035 $a(CKB)3710000000117719 035 $a(EBL)1695993 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001224377 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11790700 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001224377 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11263392 035 $a(PQKB)10622056 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001325761 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1695993 035 $a(OCoLC)880579413 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse34281 035 $a(DE-B1597)547564 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781479821303 035 $a(OCoLC)956654328 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000117719 100 $a20200723h20142014 fg 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurnn#---|un|u 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aFederalism and Subsidiarity $eNOMOS LV /$fJames E. Fleming, Jacob T Levy 210 1$aNew York, NY :$cNew York University Press,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (460 p.) 225 0 $aNOMOS - American Society for Political and Legal Philosophy ;$v21 300 $aIncludes index. 311 0 $a1-4798-6885-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tPreface --$tContributors --$t1. Defending dual federalism: A self-defeating act --$t2. Defending dual federalism: A bad idea, but not self-defeating --$t3. The puzzling persistence of dual federalism --$t4. Foot voting, federalism, and political freedom --$t5. Federalism and subsidiarity: perspectives from U.S. constitutional law --$t6. Subsidiarity, the judicial role, and the warren court?s contribution to the revival of state government --$t7. Competing conceptions of subsidiarity --$t8. Subsidiarity and robustness: building the adaptive efficiency of federal systems --$t9. Cities and federalism --$t10. Cities, subsidiarity, and federalism --$t11. The constitutional entrenchment of federalism --$t12. Federalism(s)? forms and norms: contesting rights, de-essentializing jurisdictional divides, and temporizing accommodations --$tIndex 330 $aIn Federalism and Subsidiarity, a distinguished interdisciplinary group of scholars in political science, law, and philosophy address the application and interaction of the concept of federalism within law and government. What are the best justifications for and conceptions of federalism? What are the most useful criteria for deciding what powers should be allocated to national governments and what powers reserved to state or provincial governments? What are the implications of the principle of subsidiarity for such questions? What should be the constitutional standing of cities in federations? Do we need to ?remap? federalism to reckon with the emergence of translocal and transnational organizations with porous boundaries that are not reflected in traditional jurisdictional conceptions? Examining these questions and more, this latest installation in the NOMOS series sheds new light on the allocation of power within federations. 410 0$aNomos ;$v55. 606 $aCentral-local government relations$zUnited States 606 $aCompetent authority$zUnited States 606 $aSubsidiarity$zUnited States 606 $aLocal government$zUnited States 606 $aFederal government$zUnited States 615 0$aCentral-local government relations 615 0$aCompetent authority 615 0$aSubsidiarity 615 0$aLocal government 615 0$aFederal government 676 $a342.73042 686 $aLAW039000$aPOL014000$aLAW018000$2bisacsh 702 $aFleming$b James E.$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 702 $aLevy$b Jacob T$4edt$4http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt 801 0$bDE-B1597 801 1$bDE-B1597 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910810840203321 996 $aFederalism and Subsidiarity$94031412 997 $aUNINA