LEADER 02453nam 2200601Ia 450 001 9910810792003321 005 20240410075159.0 010 $a1-280-47965-5 010 $a9786610479658 010 $a1-84544-717-4 035 $a(CKB)1000000000007545 035 $a(EBL)232298 035 $a(OCoLC)61388888 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000474676 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11284530 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000474676 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10454259 035 $a(PQKB)10338675 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC232298 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL232298 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10052606 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL47965 035 $a(OCoLC)936898965 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000007545 100 $a20000815d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aStandards and the doctoral award$b[electronic resource] /$fguest editors D. Howard Green and Malcolm Shaw 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aBradford, England $cEmerald Group Publishing$dc2002 215 $a1 online resource (72 p.) 225 0 $aQuality assurance in education ;$vv.10, no. 2 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-86176-683-0 327 $aContents; Abstracts & keywords; Editorial; Doctorates; Quality assurance issues for a PhD by published work; Discourses on research and the PhD in Design; In the dark?; A flexible approach to PhD research training; Research degree examining; Benchmarking the PhD 330 $aThis edition of Quality Assurance in Educationtakes as its theme ''Standards and the doctoralaward'' - a theme which has been ofincreasing importance to students,universities and employers over the last fiveyears or so. The Harris Report (1996) waslandmark document in the debates aboutquality issues in research awardsrecommending, in the now famous box 3, theconditions in which quality could be deliveredat PhD level (Harris, 1996). 606 $aEducation$xEvaluation 606 $aEducational accountability 615 0$aEducation$xEvaluation. 615 0$aEducational accountability. 676 $a378.2/4 701 $aGreen$b D. Howard$01609059 701 $aShaw$b Malcolm$0501385 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910810792003321 996 $aStandards and the doctoral award$93936102 997 $aUNINA