LEADER 04376nam 2200745 a 450 001 9910810229803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-282-94990-X 010 $a9786612949906 010 $a90-474-3114-6 024 7 $a10.1163/ej.9789004177710.i-234 035 $a(CKB)2670000000066488 035 $a(EBL)635052 035 $a(OCoLC)695988987 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000441642 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11284899 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000441642 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10444113 035 $a(PQKB)11368843 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC635052 035 $a(OCoLC)456421153 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789047431145 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL635052 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10439192 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL294990 035 $a(PPN)174401957 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000066488 100 $a20091005d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe regulation of transnational mergers in international and European law$b[electronic resource] /$fby Dimitris Liakopoulos and Armando Marsilia 210 $aLeiden, The Netherlands ;$aBoston $cMartinus Nijhoff Publishers$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (248 p.) 225 1 $aNijhoff international trade law series,$x1877-7392 ;$vv. 2 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-17771-X 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [215]-229) and index. 327 $aThe unilateral strategy -- A comparative analysis of EC and US merger control law : the institutional framework and procedural rules -- A comparative analysis of EC and US merger control law : the substantive rules -- A comparative analysis of merger control laws enacted by other jurisdictions -- The bilateral strategy -- Multilateral strategy : instruments of hard law -- Multilateral strategy : instruments of soft law. 330 $aThe major problem associated with the regulation of transnational mergers, which affect several national markets, is the allocation of jurisdiction. Each country concerned may wish to exert jurisdiction and apply its national competition law to regulate the anti-competitive effects a merger may have in its territory. However, this approach may lead to risks of inconsistent decisions regarding the legality of mergers. Indeed, the national competition laws applied by the regulating authorities may diverge in several aspects, which raise the likelihood of inconsistency. Therefore it is desirable to opt for regulatory approaches which are more sensitive to the transnational nature of mergers and which allow cooperation between competition authorities. A possible solution may be bilateral cooperation agreements through which two countries coordinate the enforcement activities of their national competition authorities. However, the benefits of these agreements are enjoyed only by the signatory parties. The sole reliance upon bilateral agreements does not appear to be the optimal regulatory approach towards transnational mergers. 410 0$aNijhoff international trade law series ;$vv. 2. 606 $aConsolidation and merger of corporations$xLaw and legislation$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aAntitrust law$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aInternational business enterprises$xLaw and legislation$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aConsolidation and merger of corporations$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 606 $aAntitrust law$zUnited States 606 $aInternational business enterprises$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 615 0$aConsolidation and merger of corporations$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aAntitrust law 615 0$aInternational business enterprises$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aConsolidation and merger of corporations$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aAntitrust law 615 0$aInternational business enterprises$xLaw and legislation 676 $a346/.06626 700 $aLiakopoulos$b De?me?tre?s I$01721062 701 $aMarsilia$b Armando$01721063 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910810229803321 996 $aThe regulation of transnational mergers in international and European law$94120258 997 $aUNINA