LEADER 02444oam 2200625I 450 001 9910810137103321 005 20240402121105.0 010 $a1-135-88921-X 010 $a1-138-42399-8 010 $a1-315-06061-2 010 $a1-135-88914-7 024 7 $a10.4324/9781315060613 035 $a(CKB)2550000001257141 035 $a(EBL)1665791 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001179888 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12501997 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001179888 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11198884 035 $a(PQKB)10442929 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1665791 035 $a(OCoLC)622694077 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001257141 100 $a20180706d1992 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAssigning liability for Superfund cleanups $ean analysis of policy options /$fKatherine N. Probst, Paul R. Portney 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aNew York :$cResources for the Future,$d1992. 215 $a1 online resource (78 p.) 225 1 $aRFF report 300 $a"June 1992." 311 $a0-915707-64-0 311 $a1-306-57620-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $a1. Introduction -- 2. Policy options and evaluative criteria -- 3. Analysis of policy options -- 4. Conclusions. 330 $aWhile more than 2,700 emergency removals of hazardous materials have taken place under Superfund, implementing the long-term cleanup program has been the object of considerable controversy. One of the most contentious issues is whether the liability standards in the law should be revised. The authors analyze the pros and cons associated with the current liability approach, as well as with a variety of alternative strategies. 410 0$aRFF report. 606 $aLiability for hazardous substances pollution damages$zUnited States 606 $aHazardous waste sites$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 615 0$aLiability for hazardous substances pollution damages 615 0$aHazardous waste sites$xLaw and legislation 676 $a344.73/04622 676 $a347.3044622 700 $aProbst$b Katherine N.$01629761 701 $aPortney$b Paul R$0141150 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910810137103321 996 $aAssigning liability for Superfund cleanups$93967700 997 $aUNINA