LEADER 03345nam  2200649Ia 450 
001 9910809208703321
005 20240416232309.0
010   $a1-280-17946-5
010   $a9786610179466
010   $a0-309-52708-2
035   $a(CKB)111087027008980
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000106691
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11127452
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000106691
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10111079
035   $a(PQKB)11246577
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3375870
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10049176
035   $a(OCoLC)923259562
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3375870
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111087027008980
100   $a20031120d2003      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aAssessing research-doctorate programs $ea methodology study /$fJeremiah P. Ostriker and Charlotte V. Kuh, editors, assisted by James A. Voytuk ; Committee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs, Policy and Global Affairs Division, National Research Council of the National Academies
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cThe National Academies Press$dc2003
215   $axii, 165 p
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a0-309-09058-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aFrontMatter -- Acknowledgments -- Contents -- List of Tables and Charts -- Executive Summary -- 1 Introduction -- 2 How the Study Was Conducted -- 3 Taxonomy -- 4 Quantitative Measures -- 5 Student Education and Outcomes -- 6 Reputation and Data Presentation -- 7 General Conclusions and Recommendations -- References -- Appendixes -- Appendix A Committee and Panel Member Biographical Sketches -- Appendix B Program-Initiation Consultation with Organizations -- Appendix C Meetings and Participants -- Appendix D Sample Questionnaires -- Appendix E Taxonomy of Fields and Their Subfields -- Appendix F Fields for Ph.D.s Granted During 1996-2001 -- Appendix G Technical and Statistical Techniques -- Alternate Ways to Present Rankings: Random Halves and Bootstrap Methods -- Correlates of Reputation Analysis.
606   $aResearch$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aDoctor of philosophy degree$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aScience$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$zUnited States$xEvaluation
606   $aHumanities$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$zUnited States$xEvaluation
615  0$aResearch$xEvaluation.
615  0$aDoctor of philosophy degree$xEvaluation.
615  0$aScience$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$xEvaluation.
615  0$aEngineering$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$xEvaluation.
615  0$aHumanities$xStudy and teaching (Higher)$xEvaluation.
676   $a507/.2/073
701   $aOstriker$b J. P$01126177
701   $aKuh$b Charlotte V$01126178
701   $aVoytuk$b James A$01126179
712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee to Examine the Methodology for the Assessment of Research-Doctorate Programs.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910809208703321
996   $aAssessing research-doctorate programs$93917971
997   $aUNINA