LEADER 05109nam 2200733Ia 450 001 9910808827403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-107-17857-6 010 $a1-281-08615-0 010 $a9786611086152 010 $a1-139-13210-5 010 $a0-511-35098-8 010 $a0-511-34922-X 010 $a0-511-34825-8 010 $a0-511-54546-0 010 $a0-511-35008-2 035 $a(CKB)1000000000478774 035 $a(EBL)321130 035 $a(OCoLC)667099004 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000179269 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11182196 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000179269 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10125713 035 $a(PQKB)11353377 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC321130 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL321130 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10202799 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511545467 035 $a(PPN)261318918 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000478774 100 $a20070426d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aInformed consent and clinician accountability $ethe ethics of report cards on surgeon performance /$fedited by Steve Clarke, Justin Oakley 210 $aCambridge $cCambridge University Press$d2007 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 304 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 1 $a0-521-68778-0 311 1 $a0-521-86507-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Half-title; Title; Copyright; Contents; Contributors; Acknowledgements; Reference; Introduction: Accountability, informed consent and clinician performance information; Ethical arguments for reporting clinician performance information; Historical background to surgical outcomes reporting; Modern developments; Further issues in reporting surgeon performance information; Notes; References; Part I Accountability; Part introduction; 1 Clinician report cards and the limits of evidence-based patient choice; 2 Report cards for institutions, not individuals 327 $a3 Safety, accountability, and 'choice' after the Bristol Inquiry 4 Public reports: putting patients in the picture requires a new relationship between doctors and patients; 5 Adverse event disclosure: benefits and drawbacks for patients and clinicians; 6 Report cards and performance monitoring; Part II Informed consent; Part introduction; 7 Informed consent and surgeons' performance; 8 The value and practical limits of informed consent; 9 Against the informed consent argument for surgeon report cards; 10 Trust and the limits of knowledge 327 $a11 Surgeons' report cards, heuristics, biases and informed consent 12 Report cards, informed consent and market forces; Part III Reporting performance information; Part introduction; 13 Is the reporting of an individual surgeon's clinical performance doing more harm than good for patient care?; 14 Examining the link between publicly reporting healthcare quality and quality improvement; 15 Hospital and clinician performance data: what it can and cannot tell us; 16 An ethical analysis of the defensive surgery objection to individual surgeon report cards 327 $a17 Surgeon report cards and the concept of defensive medicine18 Training, innovation and surgeons' report cards; 19 Doctors' report cards: a legal perspective; Index 330 $aThis timely book analyses and evaluates ethical and social implications of recent developments in reporting surgeon performance. It contains chapters by leading international specialists in philosophy, bioethics, epidemiology, medical administration, surgery, and law, demonstrating the diversity and complexity of debates about this topic, raising considerations of patient autonomy, accountability, justice, and the quality and safety of medical services. Performance information on individual cardiac surgeons has been publicly available in parts of the US for over a decade. Survival rates for individual cardiac surgeons in the UK have recently been released to the public. This trend is being driven by various factors, including concerns about accountability, patients' rights, quality and safety of medical care, and the need to avoid scandals in medical care. This trend is likely to extend to other countries, to other clinicians, and to professions beyond health care, making this text an essential addition to the literature available. 606 $aSurgeons$xRating of 606 $aSurgeons$xProfessional ethics 606 $aInformed consent (Medical law) 615 0$aSurgeons$xRating of. 615 0$aSurgeons$xProfessional ethics. 615 0$aInformed consent (Medical law) 676 $a174.297 701 $aClarke$b Steve$f1964-$01688990 701 $aOakley$b Justin$f1960-$01628056 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808827403321 996 $aInformed consent and clinician accountability$94196534 997 $aUNINA