LEADER 02428nam  2200625 a 450 
001 9910808698703321
005 20240131153910.0
010   $a1-282-19124-1
010   $a9786612191244
010   $a1-4438-0750-8
035   $a(CKB)2430000000015462
035   $a(EBL)1114293
035   $a(OCoLC)827209324
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000308487
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12134703
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000308487
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10258031
035   $a(PQKB)11182931
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1114293
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1114293
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10655286
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL219124
035   $a(OCoLC)666945995
035   $a(FINmELB)ELB137070
035   $a(EXLCZ)992430000000015462
100   $a20080509d2007      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe rise of authoritarian liberal democracy $ea preface to a new theory of comparative political systems /$fby Peter Baofu
210   $aNewcastle $cCambridge Scholars$d2007
210  1$aNewcastle :$cCambridge Scholars,$d2007.
215   $a1 online resource (343 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a1-84718-337-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [277]-293) and index.
327   $apt. 1. Introduction -- pt. 2. Meta-theory -- pt. 3. Theory -- pt. 4. Conclusion.
330   $aThere is something fundamentally wrong with the conventional wisdom in the field of Comparative Politics, Political Theory, and even Political Science as a whole, which rigidly conceptualize and theorize political systems in terms of different categories (e.g., liberal-democratic vs. authoritarian), which are supposed to be distinct and separate, without much mixing of each other, certainly not in any major way. A liberal-democratic political system (like the one in the U.S.), in accordance...
606   $aAuthoritarianism
606   $aLiberalism
606   $aComparative government
615  0$aAuthoritarianism.
615  0$aLiberalism.
615  0$aComparative government.
676   $a320.3
700   $aBaofu$b Peter$01611821
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910808698703321
996   $aThe rise of authoritarian liberal democracy$94116443
997   $aUNINA