LEADER 03266nam 2200745uu 450 001 9910808652003321 005 20240415193132.0 010 $a0-19-028266-5 010 $a0-19-773575-4 010 $a1-280-45133-5 010 $a0-19-535704-3 010 $a1-60256-050-1 024 7 $a10.1093/oso/9780195097344.001.0001 035 $a(CKB)1000000000363291 035 $a(EBL)271627 035 $a(OCoLC)252558962 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000174918 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11169414 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000174918 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10189081 035 $a(PQKB)10545925 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4701862 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11273314 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL45133 035 $a(OCoLC)960165945 035 $a(OCoLC)1406785451 035 $a(StDuBDS)9780197735756 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4701862 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000363291 100 $a19960507e20231996 |y | 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aHuman judgement and social policy $eirreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice /$fKenneth R. Hammond 210 1$aNew York ;$cOxford University Press,$d2023. 215 $a1 online resource (449 pages) 225 1 $aOxford scholarship online. 300 $aPreviously issued in print: 1996. 311 $a0-19-514327-2 311 $a0-19-509734-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aContents; Introduction; I: RIVALRY; 1. Irreducible Uncertainty and the Need for Judgment; 2. Duality of Error and Policy Formation; 3. Coping with Uncertainty: The Rivalry Between Intuition and Analysis; II: TENSION; 4. Tension Between Coherence and Correspondence Theories of Competence; 5. The Evolutionary Roots of Correspondence Competence; III: COMPROMISE AND RECONCILIATION; 6. Reducing Rivalry Through Compromise; 7. Task Structure and Cognitive Structure; 8. Reducing Tension Through Complementarity; IV: POSSIBILITIES; 9. Is It Possible to Learn by Intervening? 327 $a10. Is It Possible to Learn from Representing?11. Possibilities for Wisdom; 12. The Possible Future of Cognitive Competence; 13. Rivalry, Tension-Forever?; Conclusion; Some Conjectures About Competence; Epilogue; Notes; References; Indexes; Author Index; Subject Index 330 8 $aThis work focuses on how social policy grows out of the policymaker's judgment about what to do, what can be done, and what ought to be? Answers necessarily emerge from human judgment, and from human error and the unavoidable uncertainty in the world. 410 0$aOxford scholarship online. 606 $aSocial policy$xDecision making 606 $aDecision making 606 $aUncertainty 606 $aJudgment 615 0$aSocial policy$xDecision making. 615 0$aDecision making. 615 0$aUncertainty. 615 0$aJudgment. 676 $a302.3 700 $aHammond$b Kenneth R.$0959415 801 0$bStDuBDS 801 2$bUk 801 2$bStDuBDSZ 801 2$bStDuBDSZ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808652003321 996 $aHuman judgement and social policy$94151654 997 $aUNINA