LEADER 03474nam  22006614a 450 
001 9910808485803321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-107-11876-X
010   $a0-521-03745-X
010   $a0-511-15387-2
010   $a0-511-32811-7
010   $a0-511-17419-5
010   $a0-511-48787-8
010   $a1-280-42103-7
010   $a0-511-04912-9
035   $a(CKB)111056485620346
035   $a(EBL)201734
035   $a(OCoLC)437063157
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000248637
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11218980
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000248637
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10201844
035   $a(PQKB)11452765
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511487873
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC201734
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL201734
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10001911
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL42103
035   $a(EXLCZ)99111056485620346
100   $a19990210d1999      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe Son of Man debate $ea history and evaluation /$fDelbert Burkett
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aCambridge, U.K. ;$aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d1999
215   $a1 online resource (xiv, 176 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aMonograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;$v107
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311 0 $a0-521-66306-7 
311 0 $a0-511-01330-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 126-161) and indexes.
327   $aPreface -- List of abbreviations -- Introduction -- Genealogical interpretation --The human Son of Man -- The apocalyptic/messianic Son of Man -- The question of reference -- The question of authenticity -- Miscellaneous sons of men -- Exit the apocalyptic Son of Man? -- The idiomatic/nontitular son of man -- Son of Man in apocalyptic and rabbinic texts -- Conclusions -- Appendix: Surveys of research on "the Son of Man" -- List of references -- Index of passages --Index of authors -- Index of subjects.
330   $aThe expression 'Son of Man', used in the Gospels almost exclusively by Jesus, has been the object of intensive study since the Protestant Reformation, yet scholars have come to no agreement on its origin or meaning. Research in this area has been described as 'a veritable mine field' and 'a can of worms'. Because of the scope and complexity of the literature, no comprehensive survey of the subject has been written in the twentieth century. Delbert Burkett's book fills this need. It provides a comprehensive historical overview of the debate from the patristic period to 1996, and gives an evaluation of that research and a summation of the present state of the question. Burkett concludes that despite nineteen centuries of 'Son of Man' study there is no consensus concerning the meaning or origin of the expression; the debate is therefore a prime example of the limits of New Testament scholarship.
410  0$aMonograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;$v107.
606   $aSon of Man$xHistory of doctrines
615  0$aSon of Man$xHistory of doctrines.
676   $a232/.1
700   $aBurkett$b Delbert Royce$01630035
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910808485803321
996   $aThe Son of Man debate$94018237
997   $aUNINA