LEADER 03274nam  2200673Ia 450 
001 9910808347303321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-7914-8356-8
010   $a1-4237-4396-2
024 7 $a10.1515/9780791483565
035   $a(CKB)1000000000458793
035   $a(OCoLC)461441961
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10579126
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000195296
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11937279
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000195296
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10243577
035   $a(PQKB)10040497
035   $a(OCoLC)62745011
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse6262
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3407703
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10579126
035   $a(OCoLC)923408290
035   $a(DE-B1597)682086
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780791483565
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3407703
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000458793
100   $a20040402d2005      ub         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMadness and death in philosophy /$fFerit Guven
210   $aAlbany $cState University of New York Press$dc2005
215   $a1 online resource (233 p.) 
225 1 $aSUNY series in contemporary continental philosophy
300   $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph
311   $a0-7914-6394-X 
311   $a0-7914-6393-1 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 165-210) and index.
327   $aPlato : death and madness in the Phaedo and Phaedrus -- Hegel : the madness of the soul and the death of spirit -- Heidegger : death as negativity -- Heidegger : madness, negativity, truth, and history -- Foucault : the history of madness -- Conclusion : madness is not a thing of the past.
330   $aFerit Güven illuminates the historically constitutive roles of madness and death in philosophy by examining them in the light of contemporary discussions of the intersection of power and knowledge and ethical relations with the other. Historically, as Güven shows, philosophical treatments of madness and death have limited or subdued their disruptive quality. Madness and death are linked to the question of how to conceptualize the unthinkable, but Güven illustrates how this conceptualization results in a reduction to positivity of the very radical negativity these moments represent. Tracing this problematic through Plato, Hegel, Heidegger, and, finally, in the debate on madness between Foucault and Derrida, Güven gestures toward a nonreducible, disruptive form of negativity, articulated in Heidegger's critique of Hegel and Foucault's engagement with Derrida, that might allow for the preservation of real otherness and open the possibility of a true ethics of difference.
410  0$aSUNY series in contemporary continental philosophy.
606   $aDeath$xHistory
606   $aInsanity (Law)$xHistory
606   $aPhilosophy$xHistory
615  0$aDeath$xHistory.
615  0$aInsanity (Law)$xHistory.
615  0$aPhilosophy$xHistory.
676   $a128/.5
700   $aGuven$b Ferit$f1966-$01526413
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910808347303321
996   $aMadness and death in philosophy$94028584
997   $aUNINA