LEADER 03831nam  2200709   450 
001 9910808180603321
005 20200917021826.0
010   $a3-11-039429-4
010   $a3-11-036576-6
024 7 $a10.1515/9783110365764
035   $a(CKB)3710000000495661
035   $a(EBL)4006809
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001590468
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)16284679
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001590468
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)14880363
035   $a(PQKB)10551057
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4006809
035   $a(DE-B1597)428182
035   $a(OCoLC)930040685
035   $a(DE-B1597)9783110365764
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4006809
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11101733
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL838186
035   $a(OCoLC)927490342
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000495661
100   $a20151113h20152015  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aEnglish-Latvian lexicographic tradition $ea critical analysis /$fLaura Karpinska
210  1$aBerlin, [Germany] ;$aBoston, [Massachusetts] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2015.
210  4$dİ2015
215   $a1 online resource (286 p.)
225 1 $aLexicographica. Series Maior,$x0175-9264 ;$vVolume 148
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a3-11-036987-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tList of abbreviations -- $t1. Introduction -- $t2. Types of bilingual dictionaries, their functions and users? needs -- $t3. Primary and secondary sources of evidence in bilingual lexicography -- $t4. Structural levels of bilingual dictionaries -- $t5. Development of Latvian bilingual and multilingual lexicography -- $t6. Analysis of structural levels of English-Latvian dictionaries -- $t7. Guidelines for a model of a general ELD -- $t8. Conclusions -- $t9. Bibliography -- $tAppendix 1 -- $tAppendix 2 -- $tAppendix 3 -- $tAppendix 4 -- $tAppendix 5 -- $tAppendix 6 -- $tIndex -- $tKopsavilkums -- $tZusammenfassung 
330   $aSince 1987 when the first English explanatory dictionary fully based on corpus evidence was published, considerable changes related to the choice of lexicographic evidence have affected the field of lexicography. On this background (even though the volume of the lexicographic material is ample) the English-Latvian lexicographic tradition looks rather traditional and even somewhat stagnant. Thus, there is an urgent need for a detailed analytical inventory of English-Latvian dictionaries in order to facilitate new dictionary projects. This book provides a comprehensive survey of the development of the English-Latvian lexicographic tradition considering the various extra-linguistic factors which have influenced it. It studies the typical features of English-Latvian dictionaries traced throughout the tradition at the levels of their mega-, macro- and microstructure, pinpoints the problematic aspects of English-Latvian lexicography and offers theoretically grounded solutions for improving the quality of future English-Latvian dictionaries. 
410  0$aLexicographica.$pSeries maior ;$vVolume 148.
606   $aLexicography
606   $aDictionaries, Polyglot
606   $aEnglish language$vDictionaries$xLatvian
610   $aBilingual Dictionary.
610   $aEnglish.
610   $aLatvian.
615  0$aLexicography.
615  0$aDictionaries, Polyglot.
615  0$aEnglish language$xLatvian.
676   $a413.028
686   $aHE 322$2rvk
700   $aKarpinska$b Laura$01649138
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910808180603321
996   $aEnglish-Latvian lexicographic tradition$93997716
997   $aUNINA