LEADER 03289oam 2200469z- 450 001 9910808177903321 005 20210112194048.0 010 $a1-4982-2888-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000751074 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4835602 035 $a(VLeBooks)9781498228886 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000751074 100 $a20170424c2016uuuu -u- - 101 0 $aeng 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 $aConfronting Religious Judgmentalism: Christian Humanism and the Moral Imagination 210 $cWipf and Stock Publishers$d2016 210 1$aEugene, Oregon :$cCascade Books,$d[2016] 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource 225 $aConfronting Fundamentalism 311 $a1-4982-2887-9 327 $aConfronting fundamentalism: it's judgmental -- 1998, 1968, 1970: just an opinion -- Shame and the American character -- 1960: what the sky seemed to say -- Shame as a moral issue: the forbidden fruit -- From judgment to judgmentalism: some quick history -- Where do we look? -- The great Enlightenment project -- David Hume's alternative: the good heart -- How do we know? -- Is this heresy? -- Conscience as a creative process -- Postscript: What I should have said to my son. 330 $a"Come to church or go to hell. That's religious bullying. It's judgmentalism. And it's a theological distortion, a distortion insisting that shame and self-loathing are morally appropriate. In Christian humanist tradition, God is not some cosmic judge eager to smite all of us for our sinfulness. God is compassion. We are cherished by God beyond our wildest imagining. We are called to radical hospitality, not to crass judgmentalism. So where does this religious judgmentalism come from? It is the heritage of medieval theocracy: a violent, vindictive God of command and control was far more useful politically than a God of compassion, hospitality, and forgiveness. It comes from literal-minded misreading of the story of Adam and Eve and the forbidden fruit, a story about shame, not disobedience. And it comes from political success in exploiting deep-seated liabilities in the American soul: we spend our lives trying to "prove ourselves," a hopeless task. There's an alternative. In the Christian humanist tradition, authentic moral judgment is rooted in conscience as a creative process. Morality is an art demanding both rigorous consideration of the facts and thoughtful introspection. Conscience properly understood and thoughtfully practiced is an antidote to shame, incessant self-criticism, and chronic self-doubt." --$cProvided by publisher. 606 $aJudgment$xReligious aspects$xChristianity 606 $aChristian humanism 606 $aJudgment (Ethics) 606 $aFundamentalism 606 $aTheology$xHistory$yMiddle Ages, 600-1500 615 0$aJudgment$xReligious aspects$xChristianity. 615 0$aChristian humanism. 615 0$aJudgment (Ethics) 615 0$aFundamentalism. 615 0$aTheology$xHistory 676 $a241 700 $aWallace$b Catherine M$0132575 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808177903321 996 $aConfronting Religious Judgmentalism: Christian Humanism and the Moral Imagination$94176098 997 $aUNINA