LEADER 01519nam2-2200481---450- 001 990002078510203316 005 20070718134709.0 010 $a88-384-6493-6 035 $a000207851 035 $aUSA01000207851 035 $a(ALEPH)000207851USA01 035 $a000207851 100 $a20041013d2003----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $ay|||z|||001yy 200 1 $a<<2.>> : Etą medievale$fGiulio D'Onofrio 210 $aCasale Monferrato$cPiemme$d2003 215 $a599 p.$d25 cm 410 0$12001 454 1$12001 461 1$10010098797$12001$aStoria della teologia 606 0 $aTeologia$xStoria 676 $a230.09 700 1$aD'ONOFRIO,$bGiulio$0479178 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990002078510203316 951 $aII.2. 1418/2(XIV 476 2)$b185309 L.M.$cXIV$d00177013 951 $aII.2. 1418/2b(XIV 476 2 BIS)$b185310 L.M.$cXIV$d00177014 951 $aII.2. 1418/2a(XIV 476 2 A)$b185311 L.M.$cXIV$d00177015 951 $aC II c 11$b2129 DLM$cC II 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aACQUISTI$b10$c20041013$lUSA01$h1542 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20060109$lUSA01$h1334 979 $aANNAMARIA$b90$c20060109$lUSA01$h1337 979 $aCOPAT7$b90$c20070131$lUSA01$h1309 979 $aCOPAT7$b90$c20070131$lUSA01$h1310 979 $aDILAM$b90$c20070426$lUSA01$h1223 979 $aCOPAT1$b90$c20070713$lUSA01$h1112 979 $aCOPAT6$b90$c20070718$lUSA01$h1347 996 $aEtą medievale$918338 997 $aUNISA LEADER 04890nam 2200733 450 001 9910808052403321 005 20230808193554.0 010 $a1-5017-0411-7 010 $a1-5017-0410-9 024 7 $a10.7591/9781501704116 035 $a(CKB)3710000000725631 035 $a(EBL)4542909 035 $a(OCoLC)951436940 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001677805 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16486434 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001677805 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14816338 035 $a(PQKB)10618062 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001599456 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4542909 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse51414 035 $a(DE-B1597)478666 035 $a(OCoLC)979631180 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501704116 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4542909 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11220638 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL951836 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000725631 100 $a20160628h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe fight for local control $eschools, suburbs, and American democracy /$fCampbell F. Scribner 210 1$aIthaca, New York ;$aLondon, [England] :$cCornell University Press,$d2016. 210 4$d©2016 215 $a1 online resource (252 p.) 225 1 $aAmerican Institutions and Society 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-5017-0080-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIntroduction. A Past Found -- $t1. The Meaning of Local Control -- $t2. The Long History of School District Consolidation -- $t3. The Exurban Exchange -- $t4. The Struggle for Status -- $t5. The Fight for Funding -- $t6. Tax Revolts -- $t7. The Battle of Ideas -- $t8. Redefining Parents' Rights -- $tConclusion. A Past Lost -- $tBibliographic Note -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aThroughout the twentieth century, local control of school districts was one of the most contentious issues in American politics. As state and federal regulation attempted to standardize public schools, conservatives defended local prerogative as a bulwark of democratic values. Yet their commitment to those values was shifting and selective. In The Fight for Local Control, Campbell F. Scribner demonstrates how, in the decades after World War II, suburban communities appropriated legacies of rural education to assert their political autonomy and in the process radically changed educational law. Scribner's account unfolds on the metropolitan fringe, where rapid suburbanization overlapped with the consolidation of thousands of small rural schools. Rural residents initially clashed with their new neighbors, but by the 1960s the groups had rallied to resist government oversight. What began as residual opposition to school consolidation would transform into campaigns against race-based busing, unionized teachers, tax equalization, and secular curriculum. In case after case, suburban conservatives carved out new rights for local autonomy, stifling equal educational opportunity.Yet Scribner also provides insight into why many conservatives have since abandoned localism for policies that stress school choice and federal accountability. In the 1970s, as new battles arose over unions, textbooks, and taxes, districts on the rural-suburban fringe became the first to assert individual choice in the form of school vouchers, religious exemptions, and a marketplace model of education. At the same time, they began to embrace tax limitation and standardized testing, policies that checked educational bureaucracy but bypassed local school boards. The effect, Scribner concludes, has been to reinforce inequalities between districts while weakening participatory government within them, keeping the worst aspects of local control in place while forfeiting its virtues. 410 0$aAmerican institutions and society. 606 $aEducation and state$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aEducation$xPolitical aspects$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aDemocracy and education$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aEducational change$xPolitical aspects$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aSuburban schools$zUnited States$xHistory$y20th century 615 0$aEducation and state$xHistory 615 0$aEducation$xPolitical aspects$xHistory 615 0$aDemocracy and education$xHistory 615 0$aEducational change$xPolitical aspects$xHistory 615 0$aSuburban schools$xHistory 676 $a379.73 700 $aScribner$b Campbell F.$f1981-2013,$01611214 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910808052403321 996 $aThe fight for local control$93939355 997 $aUNINA