LEADER 00872nam a2200229 i 4500 001 991002020669707536 005 20020507155237.0 008 990923s1969 de ||| | ger 035 $ab11597562-39ule_inst 035 $aLE02729120$9ExL 040 $aDip.to Studi Giuridici$bita 100 1 $aSimon, Dieter$0472594 245 10$aInterpolationsberichte /$cDieter Simon 260 $a[s.l.] :$b[s.n.],$c1969 490 0 $aAus dem kodexunterricht des thalelaios ;$vC 500 $aEstr. da "Revue internatinale des droits de l'antiquite", 3 serie, tomo 16, 1969 907 $a.b11597562$b01-03-17$c02-07-02 912 $a991002020669707536 945 $aLE027 ARCHI M 1193$g1$iLE027-6163$lle027$o-$pE0.00$q-$rl$s- $t0$u0$v0$w0$x0$y.i11808925$z02-07-02 996 $aInterpolationsberichte$9896717 997 $aUNISALENTO 998 $ale027$b01-01-99$cm$da $e-$fger$gde $h0$i1 LEADER 02359nam 2200601 450 001 9910807825703321 005 20230807212117.0 010 $a0-19-877717-5 010 $a0-19-104469-5 010 $a0-19-104468-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000291001 035 $a(EBL)1876206 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001415518 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11829651 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001415518 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11362075 035 $a(PQKB)11696308 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1876206 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1876206 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10991247 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL732831 035 $a(OCoLC)899007217 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000291001 100 $a20140908d2015 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aTetralogue $eI'm right, you're wrong /$fTimothy Williamson 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aNew York, New York :$cOxford University Press,$d2015. 215 $a1 online resource (161 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-336-01549-7 311 $a0-19-872888-3 327 $aPart I. The perils of peacemaking -- Part II. The terrors of truth -- Part III. The advantages of arrogance -- Part IV. The vices of value. 330 $aFour people with radically different outlooks on the world meet on a train and start talking about what they believe. Their conversation varies from cool logical reasoning to heated personal confrontation. Each starts off convinced that he or she is right, but then doubts creep in. In a tradition going back to Plato, Timothy Williamson uses a fictional conversation to explore questions about truth and falsity, and knowledge and belief. Is truth always relative to a point of view? Is every opinion fallible? Such ideas have been used to combat dogmatism and intolerance, but are they compatible w 606 $aDogmatism 606 $aPhilosophy 606 $aThought and thinking 615 0$aDogmatism. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 615 0$aThought and thinking. 676 $a100 700 $aWilliamson$b Timothy$0562832 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910807825703321 996 $aTetralogue$91504966 997 $aUNINA