LEADER 04127nam  22007692  450 
001 9910807807503321
005 20151005020622.0
010   $a1-139-88777-7
010   $a1-107-06466-X
010   $a1-107-05628-4
010   $a1-107-05737-X
010   $a1-107-05416-8
010   $a1-107-05863-5
010   $a1-107-05516-4
010   $a1-139-01794-2
035   $a(CKB)2670000000338674
035   $a(EBL)1182918
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000834722
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11460261
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000834722
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10982230
035   $a(PQKB)11280060
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139017947
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1182918
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1182918
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10695285
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL494683
035   $a(OCoLC)833300205
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000338674
100   $a20110216d2013||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aDisability and information technology $ea comparative study in media regulation /$fEliza Varney, School of Law, Keele University$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (xxiii, 288 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge disability law and policy series
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a1-107-50289-6 
311   $a0-521-19161-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 263-282) and index.
327   $a1. The regulation of ICTs for the pursuit of citizenship rights -- 2. Case study: Canada -- 3. Case study: the European Union -- 4. Case study: the United Kingdom -- 5. Case study: the United States of America -- 6. Lessons to be learnt? : Reflection on the case studies.
330   $aDisability and Information Technology examines the extent to which regulatory frameworks for information and communication technologies (ICTs) safeguard the rights of persons with disabilities as citizenship rights. It adopts a comparative approach focused on four case studies: Canada, the European Union, the United Kingdom and the United States. It focuses on the tension between social and economic values in the regulation of ICTs and calls for a regulatory approach based on a framework of principles that reflects citizenship values. The analysis identifies challenges encountered in the jurisdictions examined and points toward the rights-based approach advanced by the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities as a benchmark in protecting the rights of persons with disabilities to have equal access to information. The research draws on a wealth of resources, including legislation, cases, interviews, consultation documents and responses from organisations representing persons with disabilities.
410  0$aCambridge disability law and policy series.
517 3 $aDisability & Information Technology
606   $aPeople with disabilities$xInformation techology$vCase studies
606   $aPeople with disabilities$xServices for$xData processing$vCase studies
606   $aComputers and people with disabilities$vCase studies
606   $aPeople with disabilities$xLegal status, laws, etc$vCase studies
606   $aMass media$xLaw and legislation$vCase studies
606   $aLibraries and people with disabilities$vCase studies
615  0$aPeople with disabilities$xInformation techology
615  0$aPeople with disabilities$xServices for$xData processing
615  0$aComputers and people with disabilities
615  0$aPeople with disabilities$xLegal status, laws, etc.
615  0$aMass media$xLaw and legislation
615  0$aLibraries and people with disabilities
676   $a004.087
700   $aVarney$b Eliza$f1978-$01708515
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910807807503321
996   $aDisability and information technology$94097563
997   $aUNINA