LEADER 03611nam  22006852  450 
001 9910807496103321
005 20151005020621.0
010   $a1-107-23714-9
010   $a1-107-30170-X
010   $a1-107-54253-7
010   $a1-107-30899-2
010   $a1-139-23698-9
010   $a1-107-31454-2
010   $a1-107-30584-5
010   $a1-107-30679-5
010   $a1-299-25733-X
035   $a(CKB)2560000000098604
035   $a(EBL)1113093
035   $a(OCoLC)828302513
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000832988
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11501391
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000832988
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10935384
035   $a(PQKB)11740441
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139236980
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1113093
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1113093
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10659316
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL456983
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000098604
100   $a20120207d2013||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$a"Crimes against peace" and international law /$fKirsten Sellars$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (xv, 316 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in international and comparative law ;$v97
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aMachine generated contents note: 1. The emergence of the concept of aggression; 2. The quest for control; 3. The creation of a crime; 4. Innovation and orthodoxy at Nuremberg; 5. The Allies and an ad hoc charge; 6. The elimination of militarism; 7. Questions of self-defence; 8. Divisions on the bench at Tokyo; 9. The uncertain legacy of crimes against peace; Postscript.
330   $aIn 1946, the judges at the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg declared 'crimes against peace' - the planning, initiation or waging of aggressive wars - to be 'the supreme international crime'. At the time, the prosecuting powers heralded the charge as being a legal milestone, but it later proved to be an anomaly arising from the unique circumstances of the post-war period. This study traces the idea of criminalising aggression, from its origins after the First World War, through its high-water mark at the post-war tribunals at Nuremberg and Tokyo, to its abandonment during the Cold War. Today, a similar charge - the 'crime of aggression' - is being mooted at the International Criminal Court, so the ideas and debates that shaped the original charge of 'crimes against peace' assume new significance and offer valuable insights to lawyers, policy-makers and scholars engaged in international law and international relations.
410  0$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ;$v97.
517 3 $a'Crimes against Peace' & International Law
606   $aCrimes against peace$xHistory
606   $aAggression (International law)$xHistory
606   $aInternational criminal law$xHistory
615  0$aCrimes against peace$xHistory.
615  0$aAggression (International law)$xHistory.
615  0$aInternational criminal law$xHistory.
676   $a341.6/2
700   $aSellars$b Kirsten$0512165
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910807496103321
996   $aCrimes against peace and international law$91080206
997   $aUNINA