LEADER 03761nam 22007334a 450 001 9910807460603321 005 20240501144856.0 010 $a0-19-026026-2 010 $a1-282-32836-0 010 $a9786612328367 010 $a0-19-970659-X 035 $a(CKB)1000000000799198 035 $a(EBL)472077 035 $a(OCoLC)463310112 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000335401 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11268868 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000335401 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10272836 035 $a(PQKB)10930814 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001100987 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL472077 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10335220 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL232836 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC472077 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000799198 100 $a20081024d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBroken landscape $eIndians, Indian tribes, and the constitution /$fFrank Pommersheim 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aOxford ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (425 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-19-991573-3 311 $a0-19-537306-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [313]-405) and index. 327 $aIntroduction : a new challenge to old assumptions -- Early contact : from colonial encounters to the Articles of Confederation -- Second opportunity : the structure and architecture of the constitution -- The Marshall trilogy : foundational but not fully constitutional? -- Lone Wolf v. Hitchcock : the birth of plenary power, incorporation, and an extraconstitutional regime -- Elk v. Wilkins : exclusion, inclusion, and the ambiguities of citizenship -- Indians and the First Amendment : the illusion of religious freedom? -- Indian law jurisprudence in the modern era : a common law approach without constitutional principle -- International law perspective : a new model of Indigenous nation sovereignty? -- Conclusion : imagination, translation, and constitutional convergence. 330 $aBroken Landscape is a sweeping chronicle of the ways that Indian tribal sovereignty is recognized within the Constitution and as it has been interpreted and misinterpreted through legal analysis and practice over the intervening decades. Built on a history of war and usurpation of land, the relationship between Indian tribes and the United States government was formally inscribed within federal structure--a structure not mirrored in the traditions of tribal governance. Although the Constitution recognized the sovereignty of Indian nations, it did not safeguard tribes against the tides of natio 606 $aIndians of North America$xLegal status, laws, etc$xHistory 606 $aConstitutional history$zUnited States 606 $aIndians of North America$xGovernment relations 606 $aIndians of North America$xPolitics and government 606 $aIndians of North America$xCivil rights$xHistory 606 $aTribal government$zUnited States 606 $aSovereignty 615 0$aIndians of North America$xLegal status, laws, etc.$xHistory. 615 0$aConstitutional history 615 0$aIndians of North America$xGovernment relations. 615 0$aIndians of North America$xPolitics and government. 615 0$aIndians of North America$xCivil rights$xHistory. 615 0$aTribal government 615 0$aSovereignty. 676 $a342.7308/72 700 $aPommersheim$b Frank$0474683 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910807460603321 996 $aBroken landscape$9245667 997 $aUNINA