LEADER 02164nam  2200613 a 450 
001 9910807370503321
005 20230721022311.0
010   $a0-674-04314-6
024 7 $a10.4159/9780674043145
035   $a(CKB)1000000000787049
035   $a(EBL)3300207
035   $a(OCoLC)798283297
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000205431
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11184245
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000205431
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10192271
035   $a(PQKB)10411686
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3300207
035   $a(DE-B1597)457757
035   $a(OCoLC)503446380
035   $a(OCoLC)979904437
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780674043145
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3300207
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10314214
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000787049
100   $a20080414d2008      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aMoral dimensions$b[electronic resource] $epermissibility, meaning, blame /$fT.M. Scanlon
210   $aCambridge, Mass. $cBelknap Press of Harvard University Press$d2008
215   $a1 online resource (264 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-674-03178-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [239]-242) and index.
327   $aThe illusory appeal of double effect -- The significance of intent -- Means and ends -- Blame.
330   $aScanlon reframes current philosophical debates as he explores the moral permissibility of an action. Blame, he argues, is a response to the meaning of an action rather than its permissibility. This analysis leads to a novel account of the conditions of moral responsibility and to important conclusions about the ethics of blame.
606   $aEnds and means
606   $aIntention
606   $aBlame
615  0$aEnds and means.
615  0$aIntention.
615  0$aBlame.
676   $a170/.42
700   $aScanlon$b Thomas$0294818
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910807370503321
996   $aMoral dimensions$94096676
997   $aUNINA