LEADER 02321nam  22005894a 450 
001 9910807237403321
005 20240515210954.0
010   $a1-4833-5162-9
010   $a1-4522-1311-9
010   $a1-4416-5357-0
035   $a(CKB)2560000000013185
035   $a(EBL)3032366
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000414339
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11290005
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000414339
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10401390
035   $a(PQKB)11197594
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3032366
035   $a(EXLCZ)992560000000013185
100   $a20040524d2005      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aCollaborative peer coaching that improves instruction $ethe 2+2 performance appraisal model /$fDwight W. Allen, Alyce C. LeBlanc
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aThousand Oaks, Calif. $cCorwin Press$dc2005
215   $a1 online resource (136 p.)
225 1 $a1-Off
300   $aIncludes index.
311   $a1-4129-0608-3 
311   $a1-4129-0609-1 
327   $aThe performance appraisal paradox -- The fine art of feedback : an interlude -- What is 2+2 anyway? -- The feedback dilemma -- The 2+2 pilot -- 2+2 takes shape -- 2+2 : a matter of leadership -- 2+2 takes off -- Beyond the 2+2 basics : a second interlude -- Institutionalizing 2+2.
330   $aBased on frequent, mutual feedback from peers, students and administrators, the 2+2 method increases meaningful contact and collaboration between teachers. It also allows for administrator participation in a less threatening context than the traditional performance appraisal, greatly reducing teachers? levels of anxiety and self-doubt, which in turn leads to increased job-satisfaction.
410  0$a1-Off
606   $aMentoring in education
606   $aPeer review
606   $aTeaching teams
615  0$aMentoring in education.
615  0$aPeer review.
615  0$aTeaching teams.
676   $a371.14/4
700   $aAllen$b Dwight William$01723159
701   $aLeBlanc$b Alyce C$01723160
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910807237403321
996   $aCollaborative peer coaching that improves instruction$94124174
997   $aUNINA