LEADER 03599nam 2200613 450 001 9910807134903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8131-6382-X 035 $a(CKB)3710000000334631 035 $a(EBL)1915835 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001433647 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11897756 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001433647 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11414072 035 $a(PQKB)10479191 035 $a(OCoLC)900345241 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse44352 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1915835 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11005480 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL691555 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1915835 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000334631 100 $a20150121h19671967 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aForeign seizures $eSabbatino and the act of state doctrine /$fby Eugene F. Mooney 210 1$a[Lexington, Kentucky] :$cUniversity of Kentucky Press,$d1967. 210 4$dİ1967 215 $a1 online resource (191 p.) 225 0 $aUniversity of Kentucky Study 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a1-322-60273-5 311 $a0-8131-5366-2 320 $aBibliography: p. [161]-164. 327 $aCover; Title; Copyright; Contents; INTRODUCTION; 1. GENESIS OF THE ACT OF STATE DOCTRINE; 2. SOUTH AMERICAN SEIZURES; The Sovereign Immunity Theme; The International Full Faith and Credit Theme; The Rule for Decision Theme; Overriding National Policy; 3. EUROPEAN SEIZURES; Communist Extraterritorial Confiscations; Early Soviet Seizures; Soviet Seizures since Diplomatic Recognition; West European-Nazi Seizures; The Nazi Seizures; The Bernstein Affair; 4. THE SABBATINO CASE; Precipitating Events; The Lower Court Decisions; The Supreme Court Decision; Justice White's Dissent 327 $aAnalytical Comparison of the Majority Minority Opinions5. SABBATINO AFTERMATH; Constitutional Problems; Legislature versus Judiciary-the Hickenlooper Amendment; Congress' ""Foreign Affairs"" Power; Congress' Power over Federal Courts; Modes of International Claims Settlements; 6. A NEW JUDICIAL POLICY BASIS; American Foreign Policy; American Pattern of Private Foreign Investment; Stock and Flow; Direction; Redirection after Castro; CODA; APPENDIXES; I. A Bibliography of Scholarly Comment on the Act of State Doctrine, the Sabbatino Case, and the Hickenlooper Amendment 327 $aII. International Pattern of Application of the Act of State DoctrineTABLE OF CASES; INDEX; A; B; C; D; E; F; H; I; J; K; L; M; N; O; P; R; S; T; U; V; W 330 $aThe United States Supreme Court framed a unique legal doctrine on foreign seizure of American-owned property in the case of Banco Nacional de Cuba v. Sabbatino in 1963. This ruling has far-reaching implications for international law, American foreign policy, and the role of the Court in both domestic and international arenas of power. Disagreeing with the Court's decisions, Eugene F. Mooney undertakes to place the Act of State Doctrine in its proper historical, jurisprudential, and political perspective.Mooney argues forcefully that the dogmatic application of the Act of State Doctrine is ind 606 $aEminent domain (International law) 606 $aAct of state 615 0$aEminent domain (International law) 615 0$aAct of state. 676 $a341.5/9 700 $aMooney$b Eugene F.$0282135 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910807134903321 996 $aForeign seizures$9673034 997 $aUNINA