LEADER 05680nam 2200745 450 001 9910807021903321 005 20230803220818.0 010 $a90-272-7079-1 035 $a(CKB)2550000001186606 035 $a(EBL)1595193 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001084613 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11573121 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001084613 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11048733 035 $a(PQKB)11095957 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1595193 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1595193 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10827041 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL565977 035 $a(OCoLC)868273419 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001186606 100 $a20140107d2014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aModes of modality $emodality, typology, and universal grammar /$fEdited by Elisabeth Leiss, University of Munich ; Werner Abraham, University of Vienna 210 1$aAmsterdam :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 215 $a1 online resource (517 p.) 225 1 $aStudies in language companion series,$x0165-7763 ;$vv. 149 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-0616-3 311 $a1-306-34726-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aModes of Modality; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Elisabeth Leiss & Werner Abraham; Introduction; 1. General background; 2. Formal properties of root vs. epistemic and evidential modality; 3. Modality in typological survey; 4. Interfaces between speech act, conditional, and modality; 5. Modality reconceptualized; 6. Covert modality; References; part i; Formal properties of modality; Interpreting modals by phase heads*; Daigo Akiba; Interpreting modals by phase heads*; 1. Introduction; 2. Root vs. epistemic modals; 2.1 Structural positions; 2.2 Scope 327 $a2.2.1 Tense 2.2.2 Adverbs; 2.2.3 Quantifiers; 2.3 Interim summary; 3. The phase-based approach to modal interpretations; 3.1 Phase-by-phase modal interpretation; 3.2 Butler's (2003) analysis; 3.3 Modal interpretations by phase heads; 4. Conclusion; Abbreviations; References; Evidentiality straddling T- and C-domains*; Nadia Varley; Evidentiality straddling T- and C-domains*; 1. Introduction; 2. Approaching the object of inquiry; 2.1 What is evidentiality?; 2.2 Evidential types; 2.3 The ASP/TNS/Mood triplet and evidentiality; 2.3.1 Theoretical background 327 $a2.3.2 The perfect paradigm and evidentiality 2.3.3 Usages of the -l morpheme in Bulgarian; 2.3.4 On mirativity; 2.3.5 Modality and evidentiality; 3. The proposal; 3.1 Speas (2004); 3.2 Deixis; 3.3 On the 1/2PRSN vs. 3PRSN asymmetry; 3.4 Person geometry and evidential "vouchers"; 3.5 The structural position(s) of evidentiality; 3.5.1 Epistemic and root modality; 3.5.2 A pervasive asymmetry: i-EVID vs. h-EVID 327 $a3.5.2.1 The doings of the left periphery. The main claim of this paper is that there is a sharp distinction to be drawn between hearsay/quotative evidentiality and inferential evidentiality (with mirativity yet a way higher, cf. 2.3.4). This also means t3.5.2.2 Explaining (and redressing) the 'boojum'. In a sequence of papers, Friedman (1982, 1986, 2001) consistently argues that the Bulgarian evidential is an elusive 'boojum', and auxiliary suppliance in conjunction with -l participles subject to (styli; 3.6 Interim considerations; 4. Crossroads of evidentiality 327 $a4.1 Logophoricity, logophoric domains, and control 5. Concluding remarks; Abbreviations; References; part ii; Typological surveys; The syntax of modal polyfunctionality revisited; Evidence from the languages of Europe; Bjo?rn Hansen; The syntax of modal polyfunctionality revisited; 0. Introduction; 1. The typological data; 2. Approaches to modal polyfunctionality; 2.1 The tradition in Germanic linguistics; 2.2 The typological perspective; 3. A classificatory typology of modal constructions; 3.1 Subject encoding; 3.2 INFL: Subject-predicate agreement 327 $a3.2.1 Subject-predicate agreement marking in modal constructions without copula 330 $aModality is one of the grammatical categories in Igbo language studies that received the least attention within the last century. There is, however, a growing awareness that the category of modality is expressed in the language through specific verbs and suffixes that have recently been (re-)categorised as modal verbs and modal suffixes, respectively (Uchechukwu 2008, 2011). This paper explores further the issue of modality in Igbo by focusing on the constructions and lexical items that could be involved in the implicit expression of modality in the language. The different types of construction 410 0$aStudies in language companion series ;$vv. 149.$x0165-7763 606 $aModality (Linguistics) 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMood 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTense 606 $aCognitive grammar 606 $aTypology (Linguistics) 606 $aLinguistic universals 615 0$aModality (Linguistics) 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xMood. 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xTense. 615 0$aCognitive grammar. 615 0$aTypology (Linguistics) 615 0$aLinguistic universals. 676 $a415/.6 701 $aLeiss$b Elisabeth$0322842 701 $aAbraham$b Werner$0158164 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910807021903321 996 $aModes of modality$94025292 997 $aUNINA