LEADER 03056nam 2200577 450 001 9910806931803321 005 20230126220104.0 010 $a3-11-060305-5 010 $a3-11-060537-6 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110605372 035 $a(CKB)4100000005958708 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5516769 035 $a(DE-B1597)496133 035 $a(OCoLC)1048015760 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110605372 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5516769 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11610630 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000005958708 100 $a20181008d2018 uy 1 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aPower and literature $estrategies of subversiveness in the Romanian novel /$fFlorin Oprescu 210 1$aBerlin ;$aBoston :$cDe Gruyter,$d2018. 215 $a1 online resource (276 pages) 225 1 $aMimesis ;$v71 311 $a3-11-060294-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tArgument --$t1. The Criticism of Ideas on Power --$t2. The Active Power of the Subject --$t3. The Reflexive Power of the Subject --$t4. The Passivity of the Subject faced with the Power of History --$t5. The Impersonalization of Power in Contemporary Novel --$tConclusions --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aAt the core of this book lies the relation between Power (as socio-political phenomenon) and the novel (as literary discourse). It shows that, in a society facing the excess of power in its various forms, novelistic fiction mediates knowledge about societal Power structures and uses specific strategies to subvert and denounce them. The first part of the study is theoretical: it presents some of the most prominent theories of Power, from Plato, Machiavelli, Nietzsche to Weber, Dahl, Lukes, Parsons, Bourdieu or Foucault. After offering a critical approach to the concepts of Power defined in the social, political and philosophical fields, it articulates the relations of Power imprinted in literary discourse within a typology of four categories. In the second part of the book, this taxonomy of Power is applied to four key novels in the context of Romanian "literary crossroads", showing how novelistic fiction not only assume a critical and subversive position against the excess of Power, but also unveils our fragility when experiencing History. 410 0$aMimesis ;$v71. 606 $aPower (Social sciences) in literature 606 $aRomanian fiction$xHistory and criticism 610 $aBourdieu. 610 $aDiscourse. 610 $aFoucault. 610 $aNovel. 610 $aPower. 615 0$aPower (Social sciences) in literature. 615 0$aRomanian fiction$xHistory and criticism. 676 $a859.3009 700 $aOprescu$b Florin$01685566 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910806931803321 996 $aPower and literature$94057808 997 $aUNINA