LEADER 02518nam 2200601 450 001 9910806189103321 005 20240131151049.0 010 $a1-4438-6335-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000000168044 035 $a(EBL)1730814 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001411151 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11889083 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001411151 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11400905 035 $a(PQKB)11475004 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1730814 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10904158 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL625955 035 $a(OCoLC)883570745 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB148486 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1730814 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000168044 100 $a20140813h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aFrom a heuristic point of view $eessays in honour of Carlo Cellucci /$fedited by Emiliano Ippoliti and Cesare Cozzo 210 1$aNewcastle upon Tyne, England :$cCambridge Scholars Publishing,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (288 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4438-5649-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTABLE OF CONTENTS; INTRODUCTION; SECTION I; CHAPTER ONE; CHAPTER TWO; CHAPTER THREE; CHAPTER FOUR; CHAPTER FIVE; CHAPTER SIX; CHAPTER SEVEN; SECTION II; CHAPTER EIGHT; CHAPTER NINE; CHAPTER TEN; CHAPTER ELEVEN; CHAPTER TWELVE; CHAPTER THIRTEEN; CHAPTER FOURTEEN; CONTRIBUTORS; INDEX 330 $aHow do we get new knowledge? Following the maverick tradition in the philosophy of science, Carlo Cellucci gradually came to the conclusion that logic can only fulfill its role in mathematics, science and philosophy if it helps us to answer this question. He argues that mathematical logic is inadequate and that we need a new logic, framed in a naturalistic conception of knowledge and philosophy - the heuristic conception. This path from logic to a naturalistic conception of knowledge and phi... 606 $aAnalysis (Philosophy) 606 $aHeuristic 606 $aPhilosophy 615 0$aAnalysis (Philosophy) 615 0$aHeuristic. 615 0$aPhilosophy. 676 $a146.4 702 $aIppoliti$b Emiliano 702 $aCozzo$b Cesare 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910806189103321 996 $aFrom a heuristic point of view$94058322 997 $aUNINA