LEADER 00656nam0-22002651i-450- 001 990001270430403321 035 $a000127043 035 $aFED01000127043 035 $a(Aleph)000127043FED01 035 $a000127043 100 $a20000920d1948----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 200 1 $aIrrationalzahlen$fder Perron Oskar 205 $a$a 210 $aNew York$cChelsea$d1948 215 $aChelsea 700 1$aPerron,$bOskar$058153 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001270430403321 952 $a14-L-7$b347$fMA1 959 $aMA1 996 $aIrrationalzahlen$9380325 997 $aUNINA DB $aING01 LEADER 03940nam 2200649 450 001 9910806107403321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-231-54222-4 024 7 $a10.7312/grav17506 035 $a(CKB)3710000000776219 035 $a(EBL)4588491 035 $a(OCoLC)956139608 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001646433 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16417642 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001646433 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14916205 035 $a(PQKB)11577991 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16343070 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14916206 035 $a(PQKB)24545322 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4588491 035 $a(DE-B1597)479971 035 $a(OCoLC)984640600 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780231542227 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4588491 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11242254 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL986038 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000776219 100 $a20160825h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aDeciding what's true $ethe rise of political fact-checking in American journalism /$fLucas Graves 210 1$aNew York :$cColumbia University Press,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (337 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-231-17506-X 311 $a0-231-17507-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tPart I. The Landscape of Fact-Checking -- $tIntroduction -- $t1. Ink-Stained Fact-Checkers -- $t2. Objectivity, Truth Seeking, and Institutional Facts -- $tPart II. The Work of Fact-Checking -- $t3. Choosing Facts to Check -- $t4. Deciding What?s True -- $t5. Operating the Truth-O-Meter -- $tPart III. The Effects of Fact-Checking -- $t6. Fact-Checkers and Their Publics -- $t7. The Limits of Fact-Checking -- $tEpilogue -- $tNotes -- $tSelected Bibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aOver the past decade, American outlets such as PolitiFact, FactCheck.org, and the Washington Post's Fact Checker have shaken up the political world by holding public figures accountable for what they say. Cited across social and national news media, these verdicts can rattle a political campaign and send the White House press corps scrambling. Yet fact-checking is a fraught kind of journalism, one that challenges reporters' traditional roles as objective observers and places them at the center of white-hot, real-time debates. As these journalists are the first to admit, in a hyperpartisan world, facts can easily slip into fiction, and decisions about which claims to investigate and how to judge them are frequently denounced as unfair play. Deciding What's True draws on Lucas Graves's unique access to the members of the newsrooms leading this movement. Graves vividly recounts the routines of journalists at three of these hyperconnected, technologically innovative organizations and what informs their approach to a story. Graves also plots a compelling, personality-driven history of the fact-checking movement and its recent evolution from the blogosphere, reflecting on its revolutionary remaking of journalistic ethics and practice. His book demonstrates the ways these rising organizations depend on professional networks and media partnerships yet have also made inroads with the academic and philanthropic worlds. These networks have become a vital source of influence as fact-checking spreads around the world. 606 $aJournalism$xObjectivity 606 $aJournalistic ethics 615 0$aJournalism$xObjectivity. 615 0$aJournalistic ethics. 676 $a302.23 700 $aGraves$b Lucas$f1970-$01672668 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910806107403321 996 $aDeciding what's true$94036174 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04626nam 22005295 450 001 9910986138003321 005 20250305120747.0 010 $a9783031832277$b(electronic bk.) 010 $z9783031832260 024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-031-83227-7 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC31946503 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL31946503 035 $a(CKB)37783630000041 035 $a(DE-He213)978-3-031-83227-7 035 $a(OCoLC)1507698236 035 $a(EXLCZ)9937783630000041 100 $a20250305d2025 u| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aRealism in International Relations: The Making of a Disarrayed Tradition /$fby Mehmet Tabak 205 $a1st ed. 2025. 210 1$aCham :$cSpringer Nature Switzerland :$cImprint: Palgrave Macmillan,$d2025. 215 $a1 online resource (281 pages) 225 1 $aPalgrave Studies in International Relations,$x2946-2681 311 08$aPrint version: Tabak, Mehmet Realism in International Relations: the Making of a Disarrayed Tradition Cham : Palgrave Macmillan,c2025 9783031832260 327 $aChapter 1: INTRODUCTION TO A DISARRAYED TRADITION ? VIA A CRITIQUE OF THE CONSENSUS VIEW -- Chapter 2: E. H. CARR?S REALISM -- Chapter 3: HANS J. MORGENTHAU?S REALISM -- Chapter 4: KENNETH N. WALTZ?S REALISM -- Chapter 5: NEOREALISM ? AS WALTZ?S THEORY ? AND ITS CRITICS -- Chapter 6: DEBATES ON INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS: A TALE OF TWO REALISMS -- Chapter 7: JOHN J. MEARSHEIMER?S OFFENSIVE REALISM -- Chapter 8: VARIETIES OF DEFENSIVE REALISM -- Chapter 9: VARIETIES OF NEOCLASSICAL REALISM -- CONCLUSION -- INDEX. 330 $aAccording to a pervasive view in the discipline of International Relations (IR): a) realism is a historical tradition, stretching all the way back to Thucydides; b) despite the important theoretical differences among themselves, realists uphold the same set of core beliefs about the workings of international politics. Together, these two claims amount to the perspective that realism is a sui generis scholarly tradition with ancient origins. The author critiques both aspects of this view by illustrating that realism is both a relatively recent tradition and a disarrayed one. He shows that the realist tradition entails conscious membership and participation in a common ?realist? discourse that has produced fundamentally different, even opposing, methodologies and theories about the same or related phenomena in international politics. In illustrating this argument, the author critically explores a variety of seminal statements of, and debates about, realism. This exploration reveals that the conceptual and theoretical shortcomings of the major statements of realism significantly explain why realism evolved as a disarrayed tradition. Overall, this book makes an important contribution to the understanding of realism in particular and IR in general. The comprehensive and critical analysis of many facets of realism this book offers also yields many didactic elements. Mehmet Tabak is Clinical Assistant Professor, Program in International Relations at New York University. In this thoroughly-researched and original book, Tabak convincingly challenges the consensus that realism is a historical tradition, which consists of an essentially unified family of theories. Realism in International Relations is a must read for any scholar of international relations. Shinasi Rama, Clinical Professor, Program in International Relations, New York University,USA. Realism in International Relations is the most comprehensive critique of realist theory to date. It is also an invaluable historical study of realism?s evolution as an intellectual tradition. Future debates in the field cannot ignore this book. Arman Grigoryan, Associate Professor, International Relations Department, Lehigh University,USA. 410 0$aPalgrave Studies in International Relations,$x2946-2681 606 $aInternational relations 606 $aSecurity, International 606 $aInternational Relations Theory 606 $aInternational Security Studies 615 0$aInternational relations. 615 0$aSecurity, International. 615 14$aInternational Relations Theory. 615 24$aInternational Security Studies. 676 $a327.101 700 $aTabak$b Mehmet$0926611 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 912 $a9910986138003321 996 $aRealism in International Relations: The Making of a Disarrayed Tradition$94350072 997 $aUNINA