LEADER 05279nam 2200613 450 001 9910798632603321 005 20230808195315.0 010 $a1-62637-556-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9781626375567 035 $a(CKB)3710000000856559 035 $a(EBL)4675540 035 $a(OCoLC)958580597 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4675540 035 $a(DE-B1597)623436 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781626375567 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000856559 100 $a20161007h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aGrowing up democratic $edoes it make a difference? /$fedited by David Denemark, Robert Mattes, Richard G. Niemi 210 1$aBoulder, Colorado :$cLynne Rienner Publishers,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (331 p.) 225 0 $aThe Global Barometers Series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-62637-519-4 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTitle Page ; Copyright page ; Contents; Tables and Figures; Tables; Table 1.1 Example Showing How to Identify Generations by Age at the Time of a Significant Political Event; Table 2.1 Political Generations in Greece, Italy, Portugal, and Spain; Table 2.2 Support for Democracy (percent); Table 2.3 Support for Democracy, by Political Generation (percent); Table 2.4 Multivariate Analyses of Support for Democracy; Table 2.5 Multivariate Analyses of Support for Democracy in Spain, 1979; Table 2.6 Multivariate Analyses of Frequency of Political Discussionwith Friends 327 $aTable 2.7 Correlates and Predictors of Political EngagementTable 3.1 Models of Support for Democracy, Satisfaction with Democracy, and Support for Liberal Democracy; Table 3.2 Effects of Democratic Cohort on Democratic Attitudes WithinIndividual Latin American Countries; Table 4.1 Years and Events Defining Political Generations in East Asian Countries; Table 4.2 Attitudes Toward Democracy in Countries Grouped by Type of Regime(percent); Table 4.3 Attitudes Toward Democracy by Generations (percent); Table 4.4 Attitudes Toward Democracy by Regime Typesa 327 $aTable 4.5 Attitudes Toward Democracy in Individual CountriesTable 5.1 Generational Cohorts by Regime Type in South Asia; Table 5.2 Support for Democracy Across Generations in South Asia(percent); Table 5.3 Attitudes Toward Democracy in South Asian Countries; Table 6.1 Long Generations in Post-Communist Eastern and Central Europe; Table 6.2 Multilevel Model of the Effects of Generation, Age, and Time onIndividual Attitudes Toward Democracy and Authoritarianism; Table 6.3 Multilevel Lifetime-Learning Models of Individual Support for Democracy and Authoritarianism 327 $aTable 7.1 Changes in Demand for and Satisfaction with Democracy Across 16 Countries, 2002-2008Table 7.2 African Political Regimes; Table 7.3 Generational Differences in Demand for Democracy and Satisfaction with Democracy Across 20 Countries, 2008; Table 7.4 Models of Demand for Democracy Across 20 Countries; Table 7.5 Models of Satisfaction with Democracy Across 20 Countries; Table 8.1 Political Generations in Advanced Democracies; Table 8.2 Support for Democracy and for Authoritarian Alternatives by Generation; Table 9.1 Eras Defining Political Generations in Arab Countries 327 $aTable 9.2 Predicted Levels of Support for Democracy and Political Islam Across Historical ErasTable 9.3 Support for Democratic and Autocratic Regimes Overall and Across Generations (percent); Table 9.4 Support for Political Islam Overall and Across Generations (percent; Table 9.5 Impact of Generations on Support for Autocracy, Democracy,and Political Islam; Table 10.1 Predictions of Democratic Attitudes for Four Political Generations; Table 10.2 Democratic Attitudes by Generations in China: ANOVA; Table 10.3 Overall Samples, Pooled-Data Analysis; Table 10.4 Analyses of Generational Subsamples 327 $aTable 10.5 Democratic Values in Asia 330 $aWhat explains differing levels of support for democracy in postauthoritarian countries? Do young people value democracy simply because they have grown up with it? Or do older generations, having experienced the alternative, value democracy more highly? Does the socialization of new generations into the norms of democratic citizenship herald the normalization of democratic governance? Or have frustrations with political corruption and economic stagnation led to the rejection of democracy or, at a minimum, the view that it is irrelevant? These questions are at the heart of this groundbreaking s 606 $aDemocracy$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aPolitical socialization$vCross-cultural studies 606 $aPolitical participation$vCross-cultural studies 615 0$aDemocracy 615 0$aPolitical socialization 615 0$aPolitical participation 676 $a321.8 702 $aDenemark$b David 702 $aMattes$b Robert B. 702 $aNiemi$b Richard G. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910798632603321 996 $aGrowing up democratic$93722565 997 $aUNINA