LEADER 05864nam 22006972 450 001 9910462793903321 005 20160107120311.0 010 $a1-107-23686-X 010 $a1-139-61084-8 010 $a1-139-60909-2 010 $a1-139-61270-0 010 $a1-139-62572-1 010 $a1-139-22711-4 010 $a1-139-61642-0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000326628 035 $a(EBL)1099912 035 $a(OCoLC)826657812 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000819831 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11503675 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000819831 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10855168 035 $a(PQKB)10693090 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9781139227117 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1099912 035 $a(PPN)232344221 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1099912 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10649580 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000326628 100 $a20120119d2013|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aGlobalization and the distribution of wealth $ethe Latin American experience, 1982-2008 /$fArie M. Kacowicz$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013. 215 $a1 online resource (xiv, 248 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-49974-7 311 $a1-107-02784-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aContents; Figures; Tables; Preface and acknowledgments; 1 Globalization and the distribution of wealth: problems and definitions; Introduction; The problematique and its current salience; Existing debates over globalization and the distribution of wealth: ideological and methodological; The missing link: developing a political intermestic model; Defining globalization and the distribution of wealth; What is globalization?; Focus on economic globalization; Political effects of economic globalization; Distribution of wealth: poverty and inequality; What is poverty? 327 $aExplaining poverty: two models and three levels of analysisWhat is inequality?; Methodology and preview of the book; Why Latin America and Argentina in particular?; How to measure globalization?; How to measure poverty and inequality?; A preview of the book; Conclusions; 2 The ethical and practical implications of poverty and inequality; The ethical dimension: human rights and distributive justice; Poverty as a global moral problem; Poverty and the logic of human rights; Inequality and the logic of distributive justice 327 $aThe prudential/pragmatic dimension: issues of security and political economySecurity arguments; Political economy arguments; Conclusions; 3 The political dimension of the links between globalization and the distribution of wealth; The links between globalization and the distribution of wealth; The Liberal argument; The Radical argument; The Realist/statist argument; The causal mechanisms between globalization and the distribution of wealth: reconciling the three approaches?; The globalization-growth-inequality-poverty causal chain 327 $aThe globalization-capital and labour mobility-poverty causal chainThe globalization-technology-poverty causal chain; The intermestic model: bringing politics back to the fore; Strong and weak states within the intermestic model; Levels of analysis of the intermestic model; Hypotheses of the intermestic model; Explaining the rationale of the hypotheses; Conclusions; 4 The Latin American experience, 1982-2008; The historical record: Latin America and globalization; The period up to 1982; The 1982-2008 period: Latin Americas reinsertion into the global economy 327 $aThe Latin American puzzle: poverty, low growth, and the persistence of high inequalityThe evolution of poverty in Latin America, 1982-2008; The evolution (and persistence) of inequality in Latin America, 1982-2008; Explaining poverty and inequality in Latin America; Links between globalization and the distribution of wealth in Latin America: are the paradigms relevant?; The Liberal argument and the Latin American experience; The Radical argument and the Latin American experience; The statist (Realist) argument and the Latin American experience 327 $aThe intermestic model: bringing politics back to the fore in Latin America 330 $aThe effects of globalization on poverty and inequality are a key issue in contemporary international politics, yet they have been neglected in international relations and comparative politics literatures. Arie M. Kacowicz explores the complex relationships between globalization and the distribution of wealth as a political problem in international relations, analyzing them through the prism of poverty and inequality. He develops a political framework (an 'intermestic model') which captures the interaction between the international and the domestic domains and explains those effects with a particular emphasis upon the state and its relations with society. He also specifies the different hypotheses about the possible links between globalization and the distribution of wealth and tests them in the context of Latin America during the years 1982-2008, with a particular focus on Argentina and the deep crisis it experienced in 2001-2. 517 3 $aGlobalization & the Distribution of Wealth 606 $aIncome distribution$zLatin America 606 $aGlobalization$zLatin America 615 0$aIncome distribution 615 0$aGlobalization 676 $a339.2098/09045 700 $aKacowicz$b Arie Marcelo$0127157 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910462793903321 996 $aGlobalization and the distribution of wealth$92449907 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04441nam 2200733 a 450 001 9910798442603321 005 20240119170641.0 010 $a1-317-17137-3 010 $a0-367-88019-9 010 $a1-315-57897-2 010 $a1-317-17136-5 010 $a1-4724-3746-2 010 $a1-317-14541-0 010 $a1-4094-2781-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000000749164 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000554665 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12160966 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000554665 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10513182 035 $a(PQKB)11388605 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL797532 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10509108 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL919228 035 $a(OCoLC)764478519 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5293791 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL331888 035 $a(OCoLC)761290136 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC797532 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2058077 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4442939 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5293791 035 $a(PPN)191945536 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000749164 100 $a20110805d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEighteenth-century women writers and the gentleman's liberation movement$b[electronic resource] $eindependence, war, masculinity, and the novel, 1778-1818 /$fby Megan A. Woodworth 210 $aFarnham, Surrey, England ;$aBurlington, Vt. $cAshgate$dc2011 215 $a[xi], 229 p 225 1 $aBritish literature in context in the long eighteenth century 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a1-4094-2780-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aUn jeune homme comme il y en a peu: Evelina and the masculine empire -- If a man dared act for himself: Cecilia and the family romance of the American Revolution -- The best were only men of theory: masculinity, revolution, and reform, 1789-1793 -- From men of theory to theoretical men: Smith, West, and masculinity at war, 1793-1802 -- A really respectable, enlightened and useful country gentleman: men of fashion, men of merit, and the rehabilitation of the landed gentleman -- Gentleman-like manner: gentlemanly professionals, merit, and the end of patronage -- You misled me by the term gentleman: a final farewell to foppery and nonsense. 330 $aIn the late eighteenth-century English novel, the question of feminism has usually been explored with respect to how women writers treat their heroines and how they engage with contemporary political debates, particularly those relating to the French Revolution. Megan Woodworth argues that women writers' ideas about their own liberty are also present in their treatment of male characters. In positing a 'Gentleman's Liberation Movement,' she suggests that Frances Burney, Charlotte Smith, Jane West, Maria Edgeworth, and Jane Austen all used their creative powers to liberate men from the very institutions and ideas about power, society, and gender that promote the subjection of women. Their writing juxtaposes the role of women in the private spheres with men's engagement in political structures and successive wars for independence (the American Revolution, the French Revolution, and the Napoleonic Wars). The failures associated with fighting these wars and the ideological debates surrounding them made plain, at least to these women writers, that in denying the universality of these natural freedoms, their liberating effects would be severely compromised. Thus, to win the same rights for which men fought, women writers sought to remake men as individuals freed from the tyranny of their patriarchal inheritance. 410 0$aBritish literature in context in the long eighteenth century. 606 $aEnglish literature$xWomen authors$xHistory and criticism 606 $aEnglish literature$y18th century$xHistory and criticism 606 $aMasculinity in literature 615 0$aEnglish literature$xWomen authors$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aMasculinity in literature. 676 $a823/.5099287 700 $aWoodworth$b Megan A$01512500 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910798442603321 996 $aEighteenth-century women writers and the gentleman's liberation movement$93746396 997 $aUNINA