LEADER 05232nam 2200589 450 001 9910797589803321 005 20230807221612.0 010 $a94-6274-336-3 035 $a(CKB)3710000000463603 035 $a(EBL)2146546 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001543701 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16134428 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001543701 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)12149007 035 $a(PQKB)10894489 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2146546 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL2146546 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11090361 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL819873 035 $a(OCoLC)918556985 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000463603 100 $a20150820h20152015 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aPreventing money laundering $ea legal study on the effectiveness of supervision in the European Union /$fMelissa van den Broek 210 1$aThe Hague, The Netherlands :$cEleven International Publishing,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (565 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a94-6236-577-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 493-539). 327 $aCover; Title page; Acknowledgements; Acronyms and abbreviations; Table of Contents; 1 Introduction; 1.1 Introduction; 1.1.1 What money laundering is and why it should be combated; 1.1.2 Existing efforts against money laundering; 1.1.3 Current knowledge of these efforts; 1.2 Definition of the problem and research question; 1.3 Scope of the research; 1.4 Terminology; 1.5 Methodology; 1.6 Relevance; 1.7 ECOLEF; 1.8 Developments after March 2014; 1.9 Readers' guide; PART I; 2 Effective supervision; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Effectiveness as a legal principle; 2.2.1 Good governance 327 $a2.2.1.1 Origin and emergence of good governance2.2.1.2 The principles of good governance; 2.2.1.3 Relationship between effectiveness and the other principles of goodgovernance; 2.2.2 The EU principle of effectiveness; 2.2.2.1 Background of the principle of effectiveness in European Union law; 2.2.2.2 The principle of effectiveness as a requirement for adequate enforcement; 2.2.3 Concluding remarks; 2.3 Minimum requirements for supervision in the Third Directive; 2.3.1 Supervision; 2.3.2 Sanctioning; 2.3.3 Proposal for a Fourth Directive; 2.3.4 Concluding remarks 327 $a2.4 Completing the framework for effective supervision2.4.1 Legislative requirements; 2.4.2 Institutional requirements; 2.4.2.1 Adequate level of independence from politics and the market; 2.4.2.2 Accountability and transparency; 2.4.2.3 Adequate resources; 2.4.2.4 Adequate knowledge of supervisees; 2.4.3 Competences and their effective application; 2.4.3.1 Adequate supervisory powers; 2.4.3.2 Adequate sanctioning powers; 2.4.3.3 Public supervision policies; 2.4.3.4 Adequate cooperation powers; 2.5 Concluding remarks; 3 Supervisory architectures in the preventive anti-money laundering policy 327 $a3.1 Introduction3.2 Background of the modelling; 3.2.1 Literature on financial supervision; 3.2.2 Design of models in the preventive anti-money laundering policy; 3.2.2.1 Key elements; 3.2.2.2 Who can combat money laundering best?; 3.3 Models of anti-money laundering supervisory architectures; 3.3.1 The FIU model; 3.3.2 The external model; 3.3.3 The internal model; 3.3.4 The hybrid model; 3.3.5 Positioning the different models; 3.4 The models exemplified; 3.4.1 Spain; 3.4.2 The Netherlands; 3.4.3 United Kingdom; 3.4.4 Sweden; 3.5 Concluding remarks; PART II 327 $a4 Anti-money laundering supervision of banks, real estate agents and accountants in Spain4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Vulnerability of Spain for money laundering; 4.3 Legal framework for the prevention of money laundering; 4.4 SEPBLAC; 4.4.1 Institutional embedding; 4.4.1.1 Commission for the Prevention of Money Laundering and MonetaryOffences; 4.4.1.2 SEPBLAC; 4.4.2 Independence and accountability; 4.4.3 Concluding remarks; 4.5 The regulation of banks, accountants and real estate agents; 4.5.1 Banks; 4.5.2 Real estate agents; 4.5.3 Accountants; 4.5.4 Designating representatives to SEPBLAC 327 $a4.5.5 Concluding remarks 330 $aMoney laundering is criminalized virtually all around the world and has been a law enforcement priority since the early 1990s. The international nature of money laundering, combined with estimations on the scope and the distorting effects it may bring about, makes it a grave danger to national and international financial markets. At the same time, money laundering is considered to be a danger to society due to its strong interaction with organized drugs and white-collar crime. Over the years, a 'twin-track approach' has been developed, aimed at the prevention of money laundering on the one han 606 $aMoney laundering$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aMoney laundering$xLaw and legislation. 676 $a364.168 700 $aBroek$b Melissa van den$01510295 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910797589803321 996 $aPreventing money laundering$93742838 997 $aUNINA